Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question

William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com> Wed, 27 June 2012 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9A921F8687 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.544
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HrCM6woulOdO for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm23-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm23-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.153]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BB4221F867D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.138.90.52] by nm23.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Jun 2012 17:27:11 -0000
Received: from [98.138.88.235] by tm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Jun 2012 17:27:11 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1035.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Jun 2012 17:27:11 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 173397.41035.bm@omp1035.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 11855 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Jun 2012 17:27:10 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=ginc1024; t=1340818030; bh=LZ8OPxebVCVzOBp9TyJ3TAR/gY5u0ar+7O6gNxMLiFE=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sCrmgh2ac9y2zqLcJjIepRI84Kdue6hPpGIPoNLpqqyB/CAt6udQhfOr/sczk+yiqXyZsqk6af70yyUpDTHsVqYuWZmpQQiayQcAhtN8RXVQRjrjcoisBOR7rKjh3xHV+vrIkZL96ih2MOp8eKoaxxyv6S09GSG+qEsbYqWK43M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ginc1024; d=yahoo-inc.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IrdH1V0SKXohokCfGXAYgv5WsXlLik3MnoWYYIWhGf+alq6LNi4EB5kdXhKDztVKmWxV0+A1qC8bCJghga8Rq7RttWYsyDAnyzZHa20+5+ko2ofnkTbtuNnsRZi/VrOovwh7ghx2rocdQXtYtjmt6I4V07Vl1dXMuryFed+LF94=;
X-YMail-OSG: KE5XhSoVM1myo06cBi__e6HLVafsy1b6EcQAPXF5YCPN9OV egWlMZDdymhzzvRE02wI0DKHnlJcKulHVpODeY2NqgJ0_X9sM4W8FF.xVDa0 RyyQB8tROSBmkRXBOYmXw4OB..TTLfqs0tPp2B.1PW2RJ3IOj0wD7sFdpi0F ndMWIUkVxEmVWvKgd1QtGqC49f7UN_WnG4U.PA5k1ix9fjUi7pizUmu0zr1V Uy8OPIGUMSnvBKxG5T9MSU_QP8N9FFP8gVmNrvMmxNtNR65ZfOUmhqEHxXlz T8IP0E0og6vN6J9oW3ggjRsxySpZG0TUOQYpuOqi26ILGwDuox2J5nJNbU0u 1lWcjNAREmJRBQCrkkcUFZU1Y12GZpZGxhzUbjLDLPGR3AKjk37lZLoResva hwWnWqyIeUf_.XD0abtaKTT.qcDKqJfmTNDI26S7_T9RFQWJM92ZZYh9s
Received: from [209.131.62.115] by web31806.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:27:10 PDT
X-RocketYMMF: william_john_mills
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392812B6B6@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAKaEYhKpeayOw4sN4=NYaoXKJQ2e5P+pP8SqJqnt-=Barb=WqA@mail.gmail.com> <4FEA6677.3020705@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <6.2.5.6.2.20120626224534.0a8b4298@resistor.net> <4FEB3060.1040805@ninebynine.org>
Message-ID: <1340818030.8183.YahooMailNeo@web31806.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:27:10 -0700
From: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FEB3060.1040805@ninebynine.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1055047407-1854079672-1340818030=:8183"
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] The acct: scheme question
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:27:15 -0000

Based on the comments to date is there consensus for a path forward?  Will we leave acct: in the WF draft or split it out?  

If we're splitting it do we have someone stepping up to author the new draft?

Thanks,

-bill