Re: [Asrg] VPNs

der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG> Tue, 07 July 2009 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mouse@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3293A6D8C for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.546
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.546 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.442, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yj0LJ+V7cG9T for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG [216.46.5.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F093A6C44 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 00:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from mouse@localhost) by Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA15710; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:09:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Message-Id: <200907070709.DAA15710@Sparkle.Rodents-Montreal.ORG>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Erik-Conspiracy: There is no Conspiracy - and if there were I wouldn't be part of it anyway.
X-Message-Flag: Microsoft: the company who gave us the botnet zombies.
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:05:56 -0400 (EDT)
To: asrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <4A52C36D.6040207@billmail.scconsult.com>
References: <20090623213728.1825.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <4A41D773.50508@telmon.org> <4A41E506.2010106@mines-paristech.fr> <20090624160052.B5DC62428A@panix5.panix.com> <4A426B9D.7090901@mines-paristech.fr> <4A43618A.6000205@tana.it> <4A4F7DD0.4040404@billmail.scconsult.com> <4A51D35E.70306@tana.it> <4A52C36D.6040207@billmail.scconsult.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] VPNs
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:10:01 -0000

> The overwhelming majority of mail I am offered by the Gmail outbounds
> is spam.  Google has played games with how they will accept abuse
> reports, giving the appearance of not really wanting them.

Why should they care?

> There is very little risk to them of missing 95% of their outbound
> spam, as long as they never drop legitimate outbound mail and keep
> their outbound legitimate mail volume large enough that it is hard
> for many sites to treat their mail as presumptive spam.

As long as their big recipients give them a free pass on their spam
spewage because of the large number of human shields, I see no reason
why it makes any sense for them to care about the spam they emit.

Oh, and, as long as no responsibility comes with the resources they are
granted authority over, of course, but that's given in today's net.

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		mouse@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B