Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)

"Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com> Thu, 08 July 2010 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0643A69B2 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 01:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.681, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKtZ7B5bqV05 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 01:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ukmta3.baesystems.com (ukmta3.baesystems.com [20.133.40.55]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3AE3A681E for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 01:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,557,1272841200"; d="scan'208";a="75212977"
Received: from unknown (HELO baemasodc004.greenlnk.net) ([10.108.36.11]) by Baemasodc001ir.sharelnk.net with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2010 09:55:26 +0100
Received: from glkms1102.GREENLNK.NET (glkms1102.greenlnk.net [10.108.36.193]) by baemasodc004.greenlnk.net (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o688tPba016150; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:55:25 +0100
Received: from GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET ([10.15.184.93]) by glkms1102.GREENLNK.NET with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:55:25 +0100
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:55:24 +0100
Message-ID: <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D033A5474@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
In-Reply-To: <4C34F2E8.1080908@piuha.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
thread-topic: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)
thread-index: AcseHDxCSgd0s+VmRNKyT76dvpiyHAAXhM6Q
References: <4C2A6BB7.1000900@piuha.net> <4C2CFADD.3040909@piuha.net> <4C34F2E8.1080908@piuha.net>
From: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
To: "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, <autoconf@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2010 08:55:25.0485 (UTC) FILETIME=[4E5EFDD0:01CB1E7B]
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:55:26 -0000

It still seems odd, at the least, to be back at the WG in AUTH48.
But having said that, there are three suggested edits. Bottom line
either version of each is acceptable. There is however a difference
in the third one. The first two are clarifying technical comments.
I'm not sure they really add anything, but they don't hurt. The
third is different though, it changes the actual meaning, from
"this is preferred", to "this is more useful", which are not the
same thing. I think the old version is what got consensus everywhere,
and changing it is a bit more than editorial. But as I said, either
is acceptable in itself.

-- 
Christopher Dearlove
Technology Leader, Communications Group
Networks, Security and Information Systems Department
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: +44 1245 242194  Fax: +44 1245 242124

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87,
Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687

-----Original Message-----
From: autoconf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:autoconf-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Jari Arkko
Sent: 07 July 2010 22:35
To: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new
AUTOCONF charter proposal)


                    *** WARNING ***

  This message has originated outside your organisation,
  either from an external partner or the Global Internet. 
      Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
 

Just a reminder that we have to decide what to do here. We will 
determine what to do based on WG feedback. Absent any significant 
opposition, the default action will be to adopt the current proposal 
(posted earlier to the list) and publish the RFC. I would like to decide

one week from now, i.e., please send comments by Wednesday, July 14th.

Jari

_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf


********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************