Re: [DNSOP] Draft for dynamic discovery of secure resolvers

[Tom Pusateri <[e-mail]>]

> On Aug 20, 2018, at 10:21 PM, Paul Vixie <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Tom Pusateri wrote:
>> ... I don’t know if it’s generally accepted that DoH will replace
>> UDP/53 or DoT in the stub resolver or DoH will just end up in the
>> browsers as a way to speed up web pages. But if DoH stays in the
>> browser and DoT is tried and used on all DNS servers, there’s not a
>> problem to solve.
> 
> if DOH is widely used by criminals, botnets, and malware to bypass perimeter security policy, then there will be a big problem and we will be solving it for many years to come, even if the browser is the only thing using it. browsers are where most modern vulns have occurred, and i expect that trend to accelerate. "because that's where the money was.”

I can see good use cases and bad ones.

If web servers did DNSSEC validation and only served addresses for names that were validated, I wouldn’t have a problem with that at all.

If web servers only served addresses for names within the domain of the web server, I wouldn’t have a problem with that either.

if they start serving non DNSSEC validated addresses for names outside their domain, I think they’re overreaching.

Tom