Re: [DNSOP] Draft for dynamic discovery of secure resolvers

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Mon, 20 August 2018 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EECF130E59 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bKc9aaj4-_y5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x22e.google.com (mail-pl0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6593130DC2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id e11-v6so7332005plb.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PHIw+kWdcbFVsPYpci/FYyl78XdvoO+sms9KglHp81w=; b=Q8+l2nEFta9Eze3kTgQisivCVGfLfLJGMRFxb4bSPrb0j4bHc6ljvp68I+Tr09L5Cf 22SZVcjh7IR7NN5IM8dFW4LIOnjPtYWgEOIRgL4LUjGthnP7+JIt/lNcc7EOor7uIdUw cwkhJMuhrAQCTimYQe1SphECI+n6ewYcMt5h4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=PHIw+kWdcbFVsPYpci/FYyl78XdvoO+sms9KglHp81w=; b=lMZuzqCZFNW+RLPLWMJJ3gC532LQ8XbSCT0HuWqvhSQlpRSCcKqPF+Nxj1z2PcfN92 pGb4daTRtpaoxax1gCN6VQ8CR2GKbPMqj3cRAoXZvHz7Q+WHo0n4ZaRFgGAqaUa26z+/ CN1AB8rthS77qf3PX3eiJmdUxi+MbVOarxENM5lXjPKW3ARRLkd3Ei0IESAYath8urYt MpWh7aBMCL7NjxRaKh+pkbOXp78WGkrHEgTcTP/+HdWeoZ+hjkpg2kLw15mWnobZV+1m jtx70mmjOUkR8LqK9rWk77ZlT9MKOjjeCMFMB7SaI1fWg7I+xCeai4n54jacAZ7OJT26 VeFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlG/wLt8vGHoMEd0HS5iS1GQ0+D3gglcea5Dd+c3HIgK5TgjB00o GB4tx6h3O2Sjp7tsGnb4R4v9CwRepbo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPxBg8TIFLkQ3QLGQVZ6JeYUAUvZBwxF1C6vOz2HX3AA9NHgwaYgTzqpxqrX32QLpDuoQzBZgg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:1ab:: with SMTP id b40-v6mr45821446plb.55.1534780458914; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2607:f2c0:101:3:e510:137d:bc64:7f84? ([2607:f2c0:101:3:e510:137d:bc64:7f84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c11-v6sm4715787pgc.70.2018.08.20.08.54.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Aug 2018 08:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15G77)
In-Reply-To: <5B7AE322.3020201@redbarn.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:54:14 -0400
Cc: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <27757AD6-C47F-4F30-A94A-F82E1309B8AD@hopcount.ca>
References: <CAC=TB13mUH2SDxFb4c3rOz0-Z6PE_r9i84_xK=dmLxiVr45+tA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=-792WkQmbTigPdqOh0dONykYycG0hheOecoQa4ai=Hw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC=TB11tG4o0dkavXGb20=DGBCrmVoRP60bpzsvq5=Q0zFjhDg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1kj7Y0dPLeDk=PMqQEpAd-Mvds6VLT8XUC1BYOfdyUbJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC=TB125M81nwiCTNr8Vbee+Z7Fh_3L+6EdZ8evXVzP-2ji4fg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1n9hDUZQ-Ltvs73T20=fpG-FR_j-t4m0kMapDiv2Us1kw@mail.gmail.com> <5B78BFB9.40103@redbarn.org> <47508D79-0D49-4F31-9BA6-6DC80C38F1DE@cable.comcast.com> <ad1f6dff-ebcc-97a9-6f4b-1ed683827cc7@dougbarton.us> <1313743534.13562.1534765718802@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <9AFE57A7-1D27-4F86-9013-E3C63E63C582@hopcount.ca> <5B7AE322.3020201@redbarn.org>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/h8X6T-5p7xunMt-bRNUxkW0KJEU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Draft for dynamic discovery of secure resolvers
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 15:54:21 -0000

On Aug 20, 2018, at 11:49, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:

> Joe Abley wrote:
> ...
>> 
>> These are the same use-case, just viewed with different bias.
>> 
> 
> so, DoH's use cases all involve either violating the law, or violating the network operator's security policy?

I don't know how you managed to read that into what I wrote. I was just saying that those two particular use-cases were the same.


Joe