Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 05 June 2017 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5D412EB47 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=ZAULGVva; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=J6bA4a95
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EWZp62N4K5NX for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 198C112EB49 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB595BE228 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 21:43:48 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1496699028; bh=3C8N9jmqrJsNSpIePuvaVrjih1KOZmd5lWKcL1ElLSA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZAULGVvaZjTJzBPiT6h2cs5RweCuFazJDe155QMsMed26cIaQPB+o4a/J+KljdEtV W0Jf/P13KbYAg03w6fopYjR3LqGRFteWistFaYRU7jUE9tlvOlV+L78iTDNDkPBXzO dqRIm/sHa3sxaGiOqJZSXDqlQY8VWUZh9VexRdgg=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WjxcwD9r7hkv for <gaia@irtf.org>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 17:43:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1496699027; bh=3C8N9jmqrJsNSpIePuvaVrjih1KOZmd5lWKcL1ElLSA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=J6bA4a952zRw/kMO9ikVPejPwZxVSo0YdvpzRSFkFCCQ6LMLUyS/1rrV/BkP6o3MP T20dDKbtSV6d9Z00wZCTMDjG2yIJF/KXh2lMY0AiB8RS3TfyAIhczSdFkjKD5Xn0sK ixZUGFfxc8jK4QOyx4OLiub4BGp8H20s90rCpGjE=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: gaia@irtf.org
Message-ID: <20170605214345.w4w4lbvujup66rjz@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <CAD499eKWfpdtizyecKOrBPdM3DffZdoMaiA6_LCs1Orga=A0bA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHxHgge4wYszOQkGMwzuLv4-BkJyRa7Rx1hPXad5MWYd6ov12g@mail.gmail.com> <A029E101-29F9-4AFD-8065-521B6A7CEF5F@libre.ws> <CAHxHgge62bmw2Hz8_mkxbH2YhCS67y0f0FTYWkk0NXR6bipzig@mail.gmail.com> <59A2FF0C-E84E-40BD-B4C7-0265F9760C32@libre.ws> <CAHxHgge9hScNJNM4OhSmX8vi0t+ZQYVtVy=BfCKySh_AueowKw@mail.gmail.com> <E945EA96-A150-4AB2-B3C9-A7F75E8F30E5@libre.ws> <20170604154328.en4muvxzifgi4k6z@mx4.yitter.info> <1a3780cb-02eb-c7b7-fd6c-7976395269b3@mayfirst.org> <CACE9THtbqBekiokzgA296S91S9zYnvxtPcPPSBNCimTKi+-siw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACE9THtbqBekiokzgA296S91S9zYnvxtPcPPSBNCimTKi+-siw@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/Uq3PA5CKXAqFwgVBolX8mDyd2gM>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 21:44:24 -0000

On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Maureen Hernandez wrote:
> create the conditions in which, when governments say they're going to
> "shut down" the Internet, they look absurd because they're going to do
> most damage to themselves."
> 
> we may not be taking into account that this government don't care about
> what they look or their "reputation" given the fact that the shutdown in
> the first place is not a very popular act.

I think I didn't make plain the point I was trying to make, which is
that there comes a time when persuasion doesn't work and you have to
let people (in this case politicians) hurt themselves.  The more
important we make Internet connectivity, the worse this gets.  There
still _are_ governments who will shut off the power to various
citizens in an effort to control the population, after all.

> Are we, as a technical community, gonna keep working pretending this is not
> happening? trying to connect the next billion to "an" Internet that will
> depend on the desire of their government rulers?

I don't think anyone is pretending that.  

We cannot, of course, do anything to correct the most foolish power
abuses in any country.  (If we had illusions about that, I should hope
the last decade has provided appropriate corrections, in every part of
the world.)  What we can do is make it (technically) hard for people
to interrupt the Internet, and make such interruptions (politically)
untenable.  Neither of those paths entails threatening sovereign
governments.  But they might, both of them, involve pursuing even
harder the work of this RG.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com