Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal

Marwan Fayed <mmf@cs.stir.ac.uk> Tue, 06 June 2017 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mmf@cs.stir.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E494F1200CF for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8J56F_Im8jjx for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from metical.cs.stir.ac.uk (metical.cs.stir.ac.uk [139.153.254.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C7B8129B2E for <gaia@irtf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 10:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 240.213.9.51.dyn.plus.net ([51.9.213.240] helo=Marwans-MacBook-Air.local) by metical.cs.stir.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mmf@cs.stir.ac.uk>) id 1dIIYZ-0002uX-Q9; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 18:46:15 +0100
To: gaia@irtf.org
References: <CAD499eKWfpdtizyecKOrBPdM3DffZdoMaiA6_LCs1Orga=A0bA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marwan Fayed <mmf@cs.stir.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <d1a9398b-bae6-5333-e1fa-b1513ff953c8@cs.stir.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 18:46:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAD499eKWfpdtizyecKOrBPdM3DffZdoMaiA6_LCs1Orga=A0bA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/795_DmuIRDb8AFbxcy_ABpvtH9w>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 17:46:26 -0000

Hi Corinne, All-

A bit late, this, but I promised to forward on behalf of a colleague who 
is off-list, but has some direct experience. There's some valid points, 
some that are re-presentations of others' comments. Might be worthwhile. 
See below.

Be well,
--marwan


"Hi Marwan, I’m not on the GAIA list, thanks for forwarding it to me. 
Please forward my response if you think it is of interest.

AfriNIC's proposal as described by the CFR article [1] does indeed seem 
like a very bad idea. In conflict zones — those countries likely to turn 
off the network when it suits are likely to be involved in conflict 
internally or with their neighbours — communication, in whatever medium, 
is the single most important thing to bring about the end of the 
conflict.  Trying to "punish" one of the belligerents by making it more 
difficult for everyone to communicate is misguided and just makes the 
situation worse. In addition to those actually in the conflict, 
technical measures to restrict communication will primarily harm regular 
people who are mainly concerned with keeping their lives afloat in 
sometimes chaotic circumstances. Some communication is better than none.

Furthermore, where the conflict is internal, it is due to inequality of 
some kind, normally having to do with land or wealth or power. Denying 
technical resources to the country means increasing scarcity. Those who 
already have the advantage of wealth and power will better be able to 
control the now artificially scarce resource, increases inequality, and 
exacerbates the causes of the conflict. That’s the opposite of the 
intended effect.

Of course governments controlling access to communications 
infrastructure in order to stifle dissent is objectionable. But this 
policy is misguided, and it is worrying to see a NIC suggesting 
political actions like this. They should be neutral and above politics, 
custodians and managers of a shared resource for humanity, not arbiters 
of human behaviour.

Best wishes,
William Waites
Edinburgh (ex-N’Djamena)

[1] 
https://www.cfr.org/article/should-technical-actors-play-political-role-internet-age"



On 03/06/2017 10:16, Corinne Cath wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> CFR invited me to write a blog about the recent AFRINIC proposal to deny 
> IP addresses to governments mandating Internet shutdowns. Might be of 
> interest.
> 
> https://www.cfr.org/article/should-technical-actors-play-political-role-internet-age
> 
> Best,
> 
> -- 
> Corinne J.N. Cath
> Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute
> 
> Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath 
> <http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath>
> Email: ccath@turing.ac.uk <mailto:ccath@turing.ac.uk> & 
> corinnecath@gmail.com <mailto:corinnecath@gmail.com>
> Twitter: @C_Cath
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
> 


-- 
Marwan Fayed
Computing Science & Math
University of Stirling
Stirling, UK FK9 4LA
+44(0)1786 46 7454