Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal

Vint Cerf <vint@google.com> Sat, 03 June 2017 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <vint@google.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C790D127444 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 06:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fcN53jUXtQ6w for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 06:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0B01126C83 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 06:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id o65so94931374oif.1 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 06:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=w25MiqE1yPZzVaK7LV1FJUYup7VvknKqlcdeY0JhMeU=; b=nSmtfIUQDfcMa2frM3zGC5S0rTMiST4CGQRE562P2klwDyXp1rdWrmkfWwm+LVu7l4 YHds80gYG1RSGQXH5Bnt9DzWJ3MuhLX3X3rtZnrkiXLIjP6Vns19WmxJ7pcLJAii/xaK KpxSx5UKR9KbBPRhurRXsdCh9CFA6JmB/9TAAU8R7PMkiqv45pmmckdZAvit2UA6Q2uH 1vORg6fvzM0/zTfau2VQhxA/THilFZh+UlTus/Q0ywuuHRpzcaiWWbYIFoPspYP4Pyuo 6iDvux1LrUpWevcwrgx+EaF+Yx+UaBtLCpCje5ZrSF1HKiD7PL02x/X09Smpc1K3fJfM G04w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w25MiqE1yPZzVaK7LV1FJUYup7VvknKqlcdeY0JhMeU=; b=JgCu+qoWVxisqsUEXbtOvrctFKqxeSqNf9KEC/y5JjiOtCSE4zJeXi7yxxRg1YRshl i1v+wmIcDSAapCg4zhSylrAD3GYmjzD6U6yg3aqjDfVot6AbqDnRz+OfIB2/7pfxDqi2 m5ZuKEQ/5ix6aiiny9xRZr6AwGh9Yx4+HE2mKSfKsGAWe/+lQpQJGDulMVIU58cgEC1O pif/V/6GeS6UixpD7J24TaUTiwjEHmggtVVWnvNRgVat1RZpjUgB7lrHq+cceO0Gh9Jt c0PtXhT3iIBTUq+nw9HJTFX7VmMAAtStz4Nmu/vPN+TvlhGu6v+l7SWtqcwl5v0IhDWp 4nZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCkhUfWwMgWTy9++nyajWBkq4HCo/2Ksme8Tsw7kx+vHu6d4Vkv lIHeiVP7Ga+Wr7Ccj5GqtH8J+AYwo+24
X-Received: by 10.202.80.203 with SMTP id e194mr7645500oib.155.1496496997070; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 06:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.18.208 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 06:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD499eKWfpdtizyecKOrBPdM3DffZdoMaiA6_LCs1Orga=A0bA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD499eKWfpdtizyecKOrBPdM3DffZdoMaiA6_LCs1Orga=A0bA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 09:36:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHxHgge4wYszOQkGMwzuLv4-BkJyRa7Rx1hPXad5MWYd6ov12g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com>
Cc: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113b00d8eb525505510e5b19"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/t_P4WZgYj3z40moHGCwrYy2TgXA>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:36:40 -0000

My reaction: politicizing IP address allocation is a mistake and could have
enormous, negative consequences including a wide range of fragmentation and
legal intimidation of the RIRs.  Advocacy is fine but withholding IP
addresses for political reasons is not wise.

v


On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> CFR invited me to write a blog about the recent AFRINIC proposal to deny
> IP addresses to governments mandating Internet shutdowns. Might be of
> interest.
>
> https://www.cfr.org/article/should-technical-actors-play-
> political-role-internet-age
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Corinne J.N. Cath
> Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute
>
> Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath
> Email: ccath@turing.ac.uk & corinnecath@gmail.com
> Twitter: @C_Cath
>
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>
>


-- 
New postal address:
Google
1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor
Reston, VA 20190