IETF Logo Mail Archive

[homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Thu, 10 August 2017 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEC21323BC for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ec-D7q7uR5PB for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77AA0127735 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049459.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049459.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v7AKP3FU037332 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:33:33 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0049459.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2c8x4u8yj8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:33:33 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7AKXWF3003927 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:33:33 -0400
Received: from alpi134.aldc.att.com (alpi134.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.4]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7AKXSbi003872 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:33:30 -0400
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com (GAALPA1MSGHUBAC.itservices.sbc.com [130.8.218.152]) by alpi134.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:33:12 GMT
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.30]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAC.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.152]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:33:12 -0400
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA
Thread-Index: AdMSExv6TskYwTm0TxW2ixuYvce/UA==
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:33:11 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBF5904@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.10.219.9]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-08-10_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1706020000 definitions=main-1708100321
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/-ngLSr3IERaDYjEZbk5SojwRino>
Subject: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:33:38 -0000

With one day left in CFA for draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming, here is my summary of what I think I've read.

Exactly 3 people have expressed support for adoption (Daniel [author], Michael R, James). Hmm. That's not a lot.

Juliusz expressed opposition to adoption, but Ray and Michael said the reasoning for objection was flawed (that Juliusz was setting the bar too high and the procedural objections were not valid in the context of IETF procedures). Ray said the purpose of a CFA is "to get agreement that a document is an appropriate direction for the WG to explore, even if it might require substantial work".
Ted [author] said he thought it might be reasonable to put the CFA on hold until Daniel did another update.
Tim C said he thought it was early for adoption (for this and related dnssd drafts).

I hope I got this summary right. Did I miss anything important?
Does anyone else have an opinion? Does anyone who has expressed an opinion want to express a new and different opinion?
Barbara

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email