Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Fri, 11 August 2017 12:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256B1132663 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6xU-2IrF7Xap for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DA3513265D for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [46.227.151.81] (port=61272 helo=rays-mbp.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1dg8cf-0001rh-7C (Exim 4.72) for homenet@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:01:01 +0100
To: homenet@ietf.org
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBF5904@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <87fucygvsb.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <21a46afd-bd38-b413-8724-d931a8b64f9d@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:01:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87fucygvsb.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/IBocE103N6AbHxIZ4F3-fLJLs2E>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:01:06 -0000


On 11/08/2017 12:59, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:

> In simple terms, I said "Why don't we try implementing bits of this
> document before we adopt".  I never said "We need seven interoperable
> independent implementations before adoption".

Juliusz,

IMNSHO, that's still too high a bar.

kind regards,

Ray