IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 11 August 2017 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D3F131D01 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JOsWmB32HSdm for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x231.google.com (mail-qt0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BC012EC11 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x231.google.com with SMTP id s6so13861256qtc.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=U3OuPZ7RRY/PYKh4RGIylU+G4Yww19kHUjLiONoCkJ4=; b=YZ500R2Licy7wP3IOkQa5ugKZPeNBWSstCGwFpkkavZwHCm3ipSiKHzf9XfaCfqm2D ORFJ8Z+/rTzN7k0ymg+6XcccNQBRN85Cp9CCxjr4PRty8aQkJ63jdHocPlikLNo6DDCO 3w/BKhM4BkL+5aBw3AEKjRWlVX5q/jV3XaAcLnIuLck46GADvspSCUteng0ktrXbRktz ugiasemltjuOxCmpC4Df1BeUBOv060JO5kAGi9VtRd3ikaKK4VqX/Lm2a5QlpHSbC/aw MCg1rAEE7ZLqr+8cGeC3KEMLzxrDK82foyIM/RAtqQQ74ycIOO+XFOo0RnsVWaNqdxub JeYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=U3OuPZ7RRY/PYKh4RGIylU+G4Yww19kHUjLiONoCkJ4=; b=G+0umSGIfksHswL8x+pF2LIU5y6iUdJw2lRshtjQDnrONmarWNR4+PzvLkUkaXUBT2 ox1CWy4aonxp6Ok6cSjXwtsA3YNq0mPZVbwCNLl8PXy255Eyik4ZSmX9ecPVgCylqo01 lRMw5k1CjdHypoRQJ93Du+NDO3xEPufMyTzo4rRdzcDIRTdA7n13IZ+3Dnu+tF+oc/lk wnX7HmqzTz1Z80BD/pRbK7u3Bn45KjILE9xyVWJXu2d8cGZPUzPWz+BdpRXO8DYCbLFz XTLOHPdJPaKPthxgu6HUZ8gKlYd0NZyNzqYmzsI6CqyqHc9x7oTPx+Lc46pnMRqz7P92 tDgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jZ6gRhaz6Jmi+8kkM0VbF3pcD9m7rpopUEbmpXJQxW9BUi3XuK p+6PIG8NHdNRCra1
X-Received: by 10.200.55.53 with SMTP id o50mr19204432qtb.211.1502411581087; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.153] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c39sm4496350qta.40.2017.08.10.17.32.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <22E4B7B8-317F-4CBB-8536-D0AB345B0837@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_78A8E208-F645-45F7-918F-E5183AEBE63F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:32:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87poc3yt3d.fsf@toke.dk>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, homenet@ietf.org
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBF5904@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <20170810203843.xq7wxdxp27vqt4pz@mx4.yitter.info> <87wp6byvw5.fsf@toke.dk> <A9C8CA05-54A0-4160-B2F0-645744BD259E@fugue.com> <87poc3yt3d.fsf@toke.dk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/8dje9Wo1gvMxD0Fu1RuFLQCctwM>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:33:05 -0000

On Aug 10, 2017, at 6:07 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> Now, assuming that I am wrong and this is actually a serious issue that
> we need to solve (of which I am not opposed to being convinced), I think
> it would be feasible to come up with a solution where we could at least
> allow less capable routers that do not implement the full MPvD support.
> I can think of at least two ways off the top of my head:
> 
> 1. Allow the router in question to offload queries to a more capable
>   router elsewhere in the homenet.
> 
> 2. Allow the router in question to just query all upstreams and combine
>   the results (and so offload the problem to the client).

Great.   Can you explain, step by step, how to do either of these things?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email