Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 11 August 2017 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD5713254F for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eu0ZvLTW12Qe for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D44E413253C for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D5D2009E; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:05:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90240806BA; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:02:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
cc: BARBARA H STARK <bs7652@att.com>, "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <296D97E1-29AA-4D25-A559-BF9D4F7D2023@iki.fi>
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBF5904@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <296D97E1-29AA-4D25-A559-BF9D4F7D2023@iki.fi>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 20:02:46 -0400
Message-ID: <25103.1502409766@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/cF3wh_0t8ab1j-44eMk9j0iusRI>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:02:50 -0000

Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi> wrote:
    > - 3.5 (PVD madness)
    > - WHY? can’t we get just rid of split horizon DNS madness and use _a_ DNS instead of N DNS servers?

I am not happy with PVD stuff either, but it's not enough to block the
document.  Rather, I want to adopt it so that we discuss this.
I understand we have to adopt the PVD document too.

    > Anyway, this is my yearly post quota used for the WG, I’ll be back in
    > 2018 :) Looking forward to using this someday, but given it requires

ha.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-