IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 11 August 2017 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D583132656 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zpmEIoTEq6Pm for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com (mail-pg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1164132654 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id v77so15226099pgb.3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AH4ckS67OxKUbUxaxUFMm6gKd7CKH4MGKiAJvafawL0=; b=nq9+cNviGWye/yK2YkQCTflAMN3S3MY4WQOljg59VnLPEOFPGMej8Kuz6km6yHq7Bk yzK2d7AVuMBM252ctfKlVJspXGo/QYX+zuDcMQ7vb7xiSdSgLepp22rae20d81bGXIle /M57H+i4oEWx5q1dnyDbmACCuUTRJl19R2iWtI0oeHj5Qen1ZxUxcmyiroAAC10sfj5N 3JjgbNK9wSS5nVYY4BUMUYoR1hfpQpmnhTrQ1BDzzfBSR9SVzYVHOCgSWYLuD1RgBJXL DElk7FIDuf/tDvIsG/D0xfEPKGA0XtQq8BUXjsESA+EGlQzucu8TAiMUS4GfNrSMVFyR l/mg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AH4ckS67OxKUbUxaxUFMm6gKd7CKH4MGKiAJvafawL0=; b=pOm09eKYECibWFg2xptdMyRxuQTf5O/+7xl8pkoljFSOW8TC4qbl3+MRFSODGGTnvX OO5sfI0eCq/VfBbY0TLjNQ1vJxGdezz5/K/fGWt32RPBy6RJiOUPulgSf+lyHZ5ns8Hy N9OylyisdLuqVYJtbqdjBEM3WI0zC/JDvjs6sL/X+TDyhguLKeoLLjrvv+WvCUmpdOPK rq5W3bkrEn/Y6VBPREe5nIVUvzeSmvMFX+F/YIhY1ol5VyPCMQLGQvoMFXqDf4Tm9ZP7 08zKnCvzOOK+FKgrXxMg4ffNWWXTaUTV4qzIE3rjYhPZJdNC+egXLTyDdbp98SGXyMyz CbNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hj5csM/B2EwxPPcjlbrXN8QjL8pN8vbe3u5EwV3R9E4w9mobB+ SzYy++/pig1ItJw1WFxmgZvccVUfBOl6
X-Received: by 10.99.97.204 with SMTP id v195mr14966065pgb.422.1502455840264; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.180.131 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.180.131 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87bmnmgtux.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBF5904@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <296D97E1-29AA-4D25-A559-BF9D4F7D2023@iki.fi> <0F31651E-77F1-433F-831D-424B21D6CDA4@fugue.com> <87bmnmgtux.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 08:50:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mTMR=p=yZzgOKOYokLsuxkS59r_vJKYxS5cM7DP2Emsw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c08b438a673eb055679c2d1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/Zn3cnb5sy7ZI2j5LDuU1RIT9P-w>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:50:50 -0000

What dnsmasq seems to be doing is trying all servers at once. That would
work too, if the pattern described in the document is followed.

On Aug 11, 2017 8:41 AM, "Juliusz Chroboczek" <jch@irif.fr> wrote:

> >     - round-robin = bad (think why happy eyeballs came up for example of
> why)
>
> > DNS resolvers use round-robining. That's how the protocol works.
>
> Does that mean that dnsmasq breaks the protocol?
>
>   http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=blob;f=src/forward.c;h=
> f22556a595673c7478706f17a22af2095e1068f8;hb=HEAD#l366
>
> -- Juliusz
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email