IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Fri, 11 August 2017 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD4D1325DD for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XSiflRgmRfXe for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [52.28.52.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81127132547 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 05:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1502456157; bh=68DtMipIDyYt64Xo+7kt7pU9rAjDPj2qlh+Wvm7abAI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ibh1qZTeTZYFGrzRCvtiBt6JuE45HqTUxdfMTAQhYL3LH6598JNYzOU2atXf4udqT Pc4xI1pKLTcoyQ2QD2Pm34z1NxlVRuZ2KywRVqNFus3hbt9RUasr5anG7TVomBWTsj FEcX9zSPqng1rTVTjVEWATpzfBZfGVdpj6L508S6Hy8kx41JOVyFg4My6zC86WE/1h ZULM9fSejNOHlYBQi4GcmQNC1jave4AUIFNRqRYDgt3YoSLqRX8QjouPt81FmRUUIp 3IMFE2qXxZmzN+NVNsHc1sTU3voZz6NID2avLugV2/cJMPcJ43Qzs4Qd67JGKn3Yzd DIVF99E8KBSRA==
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1m+218+FX_G+2W-msDWmxP8XXMKF9S0faTeCBnEEzk1uw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBF5904@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <20170810203843.xq7wxdxp27vqt4pz@mx4.yitter.info> <87wp6byvw5.fsf@toke.dk> <A9C8CA05-54A0-4160-B2F0-645744BD259E@fugue.com> <87poc3yt3d.fsf@toke.dk> <22E4B7B8-317F-4CBB-8536-D0AB345B0837@fugue.com> <87h8xez9ys.fsf@toke.dk> <CAPt1N1m+218+FX_G+2W-msDWmxP8XXMKF9S0faTeCBnEEzk1uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:55:57 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <877eyaz2jm.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/xLV9T82J2amPUGa17KUwJX0kIiM>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:56:01 -0000

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> writes:

> How does the client know in which PvD a response is intended to exist.

Well, in some cases normal source address selection rules are going to
do the trick (i.e., the client picks the source address closest to the
destination). In others it won't, and the client will get degraded
behaviour.

> Also, what problem are you trying to solve here? What you described
> sounds like it's just an attempt at implementing mpvd on a homenet
> without requiring that all routers behave the same.

Well, as I said I would be perfectly happy to just ignore the MPvD issue
entirely. What I'm trying to do is at least make it optional for a
homenet router to implement it... :)

-Toke

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email