Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA

"Ralf Weber" <dns@fl1ger.de> Wed, 16 August 2017 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dns@fl1ger.de>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD874132510 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R818_ROeKcxq for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.guxx.net (nyx.guxx.net [85.10.208.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4509A132551 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix, from userid 107) id AEB085F40455; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:55:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.20.10.3] (tmo-100-232.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.100.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E4795F4004A; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:55:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:55:22 +0200
Message-ID: <D70AED02-5EE5-45B8-8BAC-C38C8C38E8EB@fl1ger.de>
In-Reply-To: <877ey4y62g.fsf@toke.dk>
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBF5904@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <87poc3yt3d.fsf@toke.dk> <22E4B7B8-317F-4CBB-8536-D0AB345B0837@fugue.com> <87h8xez9ys.fsf@toke.dk> <CAPt1N1m+218+FX_G+2W-msDWmxP8XXMKF9S0faTeCBnEEzk1uw@mail.gmail.com> <877eyaz2jm.fsf@toke.dk> <CAPt1N1m5nVGD-y2VrbkoTEPTs4qF98oRxGuvd-Has1yzuS0fmg@mail.gmail.com> <874ltez1wg.fsf@toke.dk> <7E8390B5-9048-4783-B17F-6C9EA5610887@fugue.com> <7ivalujdfu.wl-jch@irif.fr> <15F1CE39-82EE-4B0D-A31B-2C1805991541@fugue.com> <871sofzqma.fsf@toke.dk> <CAPt1N1=oiU+DbjD6izOBNJOnC25d=-S3ARqFxydRfWLEet5mEQ@mail.gmail.com> <87valry4o7.fsf@toke.dk> <FCAD81FA-BBA0-45B0-8F1F-D1D5FD010484@fugue.com> <87shgvxybl.fsf@toke.dk> <4AF8CF8A-F781-449F-9C53-A9603889746E@fugue.com> <87lgmnxr3u.fsf@toke.dk> <E3E75086-BF36-4F59-86BD-7FFDAFE772AB@fugue.com> <87fuctxdrc.fsf@toke.dk> <FB44A942-9DE3-4CE6-88C5-402B20756462@fugue.com> <877ey4y62g.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/YLtMLDPd9pqB2u7guKTERABEh2Q>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 07:55:30 -0000

Moin!

On 15 Aug 2017, at 21:38, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> writes:
>> I think we are wandering off into nonsense territory here.   Have you
>> observed this sort of problem in the field?   If so, can you describe
>> what happened?   If not, why would we optimize for it?
>
> If you consider flaky ISP DNS servers to be "nonsense" you are clearly
> more fortunate with your ISPs than me. And that's before even going into
> the DNS censorship issue; in my part of the world ISP DNS servers are
> broken *by design*.
And we wonder why there is no ISP/operator participation in the IETF...
Your email address indicates you live in Denmark. I personally know people
at ISPs in Denmark who run DNS resolvers for their customers and I in a
previous job ran DNS servers for customers in Denmark, although the actual
servers where located in Sweden and Germany. I can assure you that neither
I nor my colleagues design DNS servers to be broken. If you have an issue
with your ISP open a ticket with them and if they can't fix it switch ISPs.
But don't blame all the ISPs to deliver broken service, without evidence.

So long
-Ralf