IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 18 August 2017 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A60132744 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ulos9Ggr2eVD for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 240E71326E1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x77so2212668qka.5 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=4r/jXfB3BZD5H7n97IEdarA2hX+Z5XYQbJF8r8WlS9Y=; b=TMmBkV/bQCLcU1o9GYYuy5j6yvBDTaMSroZj/DhRcTzE45YurOXJqOXd8bQL/MgE4/ Gma8V/xr1fItQ1NiUvJCun1yVFIYjN5wrKqv4M77sDapT+Yn0h/MKb65+Ln7Zdm1Jngn ydqyXb4tB0lvjsH1TRsC2tZScDxOwFapCV2+3mGI816hXoYT8yy+7oY6byLTfnkxvJpM VHIRnfu7sSwia/dU3+NBf/TWNe95Mwbnk6o/xhzewdb1ACzxXm6lT6yxHAkG2PKOky/6 kVj+Gze2YD3qU5LY7Q0dbEBFXsq5t1i0z9d8D4cr3GkWo/RNuBgWWdt8FZEwm/k8fy5N FodQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=4r/jXfB3BZD5H7n97IEdarA2hX+Z5XYQbJF8r8WlS9Y=; b=PDzfXKLlNgOi+/n0Pio3hKbDcULcKWhp4kvhWcrWHL7+6CEG3ISuZMOO0D6bCc0KjO 5DlQg+/1eSpXZOVqrMEcoh5GGmCn68DJ+UBcKEQgYV8an37lFS9maF5xAdJk3YZ2YkhE SCy8wN19jtQ71xRQg2R+WAGHfajGidNry2uC15xwwh/QBrp8k+PWTsZcZh+LjmF5rcc3 khAtRixMQwQqfoUXJKcEssR1EBxI1TU4dlPWt746Q8VS+Ly2Qp5o/l7SfrLi3PNaRdnt oTznJzVXqBI+SpB3ialGTX5A5A7oQVhqmdnrlsHb/LXmf1CusVKHTo8h8QlvTFu4N63U YP+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5ilKizmOgX+Dsa5p+tohZcTHQ3P5Nt5SK3VswyWm4UdIrKZr5Qb PXM+BkU0UIMeIU9rtRHzVGHU
X-Received: by 10.55.98.213 with SMTP id w204mr4218985qkb.175.1503020015328; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.153] (c-24-60-163-103.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.60.163.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm3389767qtb.89.2017.08.17.18.33.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <C45236E5-ABAB-4F33-8256-64EFB834E54F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3002DF9C-6D08-4D40-B3AB-010EEFFC58E8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 21:33:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20170817201054.GN45648@Space.Net>
Cc: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
References: <87fuctxdrc.fsf@toke.dk> <FB44A942-9DE3-4CE6-88C5-402B20756462@fugue.com> <877ey4y62g.fsf@toke.dk> <6DF8489E-D780-4E4C-A132-31EEF8285BB7@fugue.com> <874lt8xv9j.fsf@toke.dk> <3DE50D7C-53BF-4758-8DED-A2CA89C8ABE7@fugue.com> <871soby776.fsf@toke.dk> <769C4508-BB58-4BCB-A3CE-3657FB43A8AA@fugue.com> <87k223jjdg.wl-jch@irif.fr> <CAPt1N1=rb-pvddpEDWD9AscGTs=TsU5bo7tywn9Gj1tsSdAZKQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170817201054.GN45648@Space.Net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/pdIu5alGLojGJ7hgMUxbNeIiBY4>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Status of draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming CFA
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 01:33:38 -0000

El 17 ag 2017, a les 16:10, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> va escriure:
> 1990s never had uplinks that fast *and* unreliable at the same time 
> as many of today's consumer ISPs offer.

That was my point: you tunnel to the 1990's to get the leased line (a term that I think most people would just squint at nowadays and have no idea what you meant).   The lossy fast connection you'd get to directly—no need for a wormhole.   But in practice, (a) the lossy connection isn't anywhere near as lossy as you are implying; if it were, you couldn't use it.  And (b) even if it were, I don't think anything we are talking about here would actually help with that.   So I think it would be wise if we took this use case off the table, unless someone can characterize it better.   Reasoning on the basis of charicatures isn't going to get us anywhere.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email