IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 22 June 2022 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC65C14CF1B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T-WZ_otH_hv6 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 17:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADB7C14F606 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 17:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56F511E345; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:23:19 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_331D8D7E-8813-4ABC-9C57-90BCBA841BDA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4337C1704EE6D3A9F889798CC1B39@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:23:19 -0400
Cc: Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <1D62D4F2-EAA1-4926-B389-950A9EAD86F1@pfrc.org>
References: <A7C54708-0C2D-45B2-B433-A27A34B3656C@cisco.com> <BYAPR08MB4872D048E710FDC448F5C75AB3B39@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <2AAD304E-36D6-4536-854C-71F97D2FA9D5@pfrc.org> <BY5PR11MB4337C1704EE6D3A9F889798CC1B39@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/-PSpJHMESKeKVcsBKFCQ_L8qeio>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:23:23 -0000

Les,


> On Jun 21, 2022, at 6:59 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com> wrote:
> Let me first say – with a tip of my cap to you – that I very rarely find anything objectionable in any of your posts.
>  
> But, this case is an exception. 😊

Hah!
 
> WG meeting time is an extremely limited resource and there are many more substantive and interesting topics that would benefit from a live discussion. Please do not consume this limited resource on such a mundane topic.
> If folks are interested in commenting on the points you make below, I think the mailing list is both appropriate and sufficient.

This is a fair point.

I agree with Aijun that it would be good to distill the results of my questions into a draft.  I think it'd save a lot of energy for the future.


-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email