Re: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 09 June 2022 08:08 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69FBC159490 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 01:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FMvGZBjLARdt for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 01:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E934C14F726 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2022 01:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id fu3so44391345ejc.7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 01:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HxdrCFRpFeFewgZrnm11Mq+z479FXea3ZFSqB8GwyXk=; b=eNBTtU1hxKv/r7Sye632Xq7mqrtA2sKWyBp6ce0mSKyeGBH1JzPMqgGXb78731cJH7 1rWT7FM7Y8GOWKsDP4YSJrM8LM9PWC77OBdbl4wD4+KAh2KayxES/+8hga5izIAwMn4B bun7t5MIURUhvxbJEUbLVJ9n6l2z7d/JMDQNQ71bexNa7mUrzGgwUeDZwP3FnRTLMn1A W60VE9WOrVt/v9UG2ZhYotAk8zzQ8uSxxpo32Cp3TdTelE3j5Xu45rv+vv5Odpq7u+NX j1DkVEuz+CWBkY2xFKk2IhDZ+hkM5dAX/oExCCbr4HIqu8XXuOSzWd/M3edpi2gK3u7I aBYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HxdrCFRpFeFewgZrnm11Mq+z479FXea3ZFSqB8GwyXk=; b=C1J+d6lvjVpWV9UoS5au1dRF/NxajQgg7X03cp1V8RO09fLQ52HbfBzpLB2RtdUwjt 097+v+oUjQPLimU/B4DhnznztgFCXG308Gvhb1lW5iH6FDwZA0sUro5AGmIrkgxPI0+8 uqsmUeE0EkWbSvXo3ONVT03lM6MfhNFyB7WiD0UdetBHIkmYTLN824duUU4hqk7Fjxuq 7+YIHIwPOXZ6JXaUPqB2+fNrwZ1SYQztHgLeIYaRykhx0PpChZXmFFvmRhwS1kXvAAFR 3kOpXSV0m8KQuzIbzohZgSR7G4dnAoOxKtt9AKBrSsLgQqca/JeDkICJhyqkgLA6O/r8 r0kg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532l5v6RcVdTeCpFnpmAcHdj6WLMGzvs/Q450cDqL0hhssTfmnLv 1qt2MuUlbXRe1JGGj6Qfkb0Q8Tc03S7yY5EgpnjcdQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8Ct9hx1ivJzeCTY1y8ZcCHUa81DLEHM2we3kVn7ewE3yqZkztyqZ1+2FzYDQXMUIuLJj6g13JjLWxNT+wL04=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6d92:b0:6ff:11bb:cce7 with SMTP id sb18-20020a1709076d9200b006ff11bbcce7mr34087243ejc.166.1654762100984; Thu, 09 Jun 2022 01:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A7C54708-0C2D-45B2-B433-A27A34B3656C@cisco.com> <8F2F8D96-EDB7-4ECA-AB0E-B316F6770CFB@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8F2F8D96-EDB7-4ECA-AB0E-B316F6770CFB@gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 10:08:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMFWpHHkH04XM9G2edqodCGKGNdgj6LjptTFBC9=UesXHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000037ada805e0ff537b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/cAqu3RT7AizD-3YGJs3kdwd1og4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 08:08:26 -0000

Jeff,

If you "operate" the network it is your choice to either request vendors to
support what makes most sense or add it to your own OS and protocol stack
of choice. It is also your choice to use tool which are technically sound
and do not bring as you said "pollution"

No excuse.

Thx,
R.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 8:05 AM Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I support the adoption.
> Do I like further pollution of BGP (which I contributed to)?  not really,
> however this is an opinion, in reality - I operate one of the largest
> networks in the world, and my company has invested millions of $$ and is
> extensively using BGP-LS. With all the best intentions - here we are.
> I’m aware of at least 2 implementations that can stream LSDB over a much
> better transport, however this seems not to gain any popularity, that’s it.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>
> On Jun 7, 2022, at 05:32, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=
> 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> 
>
> I support WG adoption – the corresponding LSR draft has completed WG last
> call and is awaiting AD review.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
>
> *From: *Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <
> shares@ndzh.com>
> *Date: *Monday, June 6, 2022 at 5:28 PM
> *To: *IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6
> to 6/20)
>
>
>
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
> draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01.txt
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr/
>
>
>
>   This document defines one new BGP-LS (BGP Link-State) TLV for
>
>    Flood Reflection to match the ISIS TLV for flood reduction.
>
>
>
>    The draft is short (5 total pages).
>
>
>
> Since this BGP-LS feature has been adopted by IS-IS,
>
> Please consider
>
>
>
> 1.       Is there any technical difficulty with adding this to the BGP-LS
> code points?
>
> 2.   Is this draft ready for publication?
>
> 3.   Does this addition help operational networks.
>
>
>
> Cheers, Sue Hares
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>