IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 21 June 2022 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706BAC14CF1C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 16:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zSJ81y5CcAQQ for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 16:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ACBFC14CF12 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 16:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id es26so19843268edb.4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 16:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=v0wz0N0mDh5Hg1BujUYVC8Tq2g9O6jxkPmney4gvOug=; b=Q+UPwmiu5ONxJi+aTW/IvUJLXbY75hI3KadvYzIkvoHFBZixUw3vA0zq6K+9B33g0v Of1g+JAdPhOsLwdPg+eKzDwkxeycxilb1CQSvjSwpnUFqWX7Vp1ecMTh5sZCX8TKjAuE Lq28W1ZCaNC4OAbSqUsguD6Ija8hZ7Mgr0GtzvAXIrlryZx+OYB7PYjOLk8HFv2iqcVy UCZQFg3y6H0agwQ3quE2/lbdowthY0TxrSigiHinFYxDn5P8DzM+DxJ+fdUv1A9UZTtm GfHs8qA/DPWydp7VOu0dtHq/v87PA70AI8n1AbeRIN5V20/9pkdRdqgDBr+Q08arJS3n A2cw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v0wz0N0mDh5Hg1BujUYVC8Tq2g9O6jxkPmney4gvOug=; b=obY4+gOIXMRaTzNdk+3/DW9Wp4vokyOMbaagcFyyi9DJl3MUKsy7Wxwe4YtEHb7OE0 wcJ/gA558M6noEUkyq2dD5fI8vMsDUNQ5kdamG3zRoslJm3rsEzCZnOc9o56CQ3Wii6t ZqvihK/wQSARZoauY673OH+w7bAblKJvFevre3+d+/AwZHzMr1v+YqG6SJ+JB1Gha4QE 6q6IIwUMZxcYchuNoPEZpnZhRZb8caJ8H1Nxb+BcgFk4mjWEqaV/6BTTEesuGFF+RE95 tCYXVnesBag8tDXt4DAz0FFV2pc23DEqqHKe55dY9/YUtP/Z1VhlqNZhPHDKoW3L6FrG AXFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/OTwJNlaGFL07n/RuxfBWbi1NSVEjQqG4gmexWJ+1sXzyKMCLz NpBpmzaj3mBNFsV6TRzS9Fxkqg99wqXn4ZOIEoiPmuDp4ZY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sVSU1aTI1Uz+oWNYz0eJUxR0x15Wk0C7Fosjb9x/eF3iI7hWoWy/VBQ8ML8WWilYWXx9xejgUiJstOL2apQUw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1c09:b0:435:6562:e70d with SMTP id ck9-20020a0564021c0900b004356562e70dmr755434edb.203.1655855733061; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 16:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A7C54708-0C2D-45B2-B433-A27A34B3656C@cisco.com> <BYAPR08MB4872D048E710FDC448F5C75AB3B39@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <2AAD304E-36D6-4536-854C-71F97D2FA9D5@pfrc.org> <BY5PR11MB4337C1704EE6D3A9F889798CC1B39@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMEnuKQu_Hf8jgNzhzgizL9syNuPL9qHPeJDvdR2Av86Nw@mail.gmail.com> <0E6D4C59-FE40-490C-9B5E-6584BA53C8BC@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMEHeOD0WnD2P_08d2QPKxF7=oiR5eyYkxcCnatkxJDHVg@mail.gmail.com> <1C65591B-3A18-48A9-9E82-9AB03A4A11A6@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1C65591B-3A18-48A9-9E82-9AB03A4A11A6@cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 01:55:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGN_w8S9ZOdLNeve76eKbAb5QNWP9Z0c1WoQaSBJcMUJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c4c87905e1fdf44e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/W0rGdTq46g0GfyHcwCUoprI1XKQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 23:55:38 -0000

Hi Acee,


> I believe your perspective is limited by the solution you have in mind.
>

Well it does not matter what I have in mind. My comments are solely driven
by what I consider would be a seamless migration to for those who use
BGP-LS  for today.

I feel this protocol would be better discussed in the RTG WG.
>

Not sure I would agree but not my call. As long as it is not IDR WG I am
perfectly happy :)

Cheers,
Robert.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email