IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20)

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 09 June 2022 06:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4278BC14CF0A for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 23:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CL-F5Udg4zux for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 23:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 941F6C157B58 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 23:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id o6so14385138plg.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 23:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=rPfSONaaVvCt8MNTRXfmowYpKlTZYaGF3pknVzJkaE0=; b=MTH4/Ouh2N2nsoyPfqLczoT6YIFnNDByMtfhWifQN/VV3d9fCT8bV4/37sVZUw/Lco funEMvi1MN0AF3b55QFNmnQbXKl8sPovVZ/FkL3Cti4169Xzx+uNUhaUjpyCrEsF5QZ8 mObpEgUko7KrI3h11bwu9I+2/S/kVteNLWQYz6BwZutXiFc6J1SbYvZC3gnUkJIj+clt 5fApv1LcB9hycwfAwfqFsFTSTTvndscsZZnM1VToWwrhrT2uSu+hIKXeSa9BLf7QnAgm hizlQavjxtPQ7wisNWsN0QEOvEh0ubWKQuVyJkcm6v3EnYlHjbDW/c70x5JM0mHoXWzs 4I9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=rPfSONaaVvCt8MNTRXfmowYpKlTZYaGF3pknVzJkaE0=; b=GtmoVSCLPKZyZpKrV+msaxyxsL4tnATYC60fQ1TGANkZ7nTTFGVy7V8L8sRO+OzBGM 3i/Ho7L4tLHyPmO5kEcon0I8DKP1pxkIDDCKMrib5ZbHF5M8B004nfCII6aS4x3rd3e/ k6cvi/FrJXh2wrlaeGLMuiDUUZIH6AHOYbnYPneo99q6op3ZqGSHqipETQHEcyMZPvJJ rmCa5IK2iHuylMpzGMxUnFBNjaRV8IPqKwnSDV2uZC5dG/1A6vQ01K5XOVbA2r+rYi2r HiMw0+6fRy8+e3SfkbvD9D/s3sotDjl7XB4+3l30EL8I3SVrNahDJ+vhnwtWSyAC0lFf vCtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532TAww4KbMo9XhDNncxTHR+zEyYXJljydP1hGPGCZZY/wPdsfJl ud7qUV9ZihLNaunDhzC4NaBPVPEJX68=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQf34+QGDjAToGWymaUvG5uB5Uzo9+FFL6YmKRhw4I3o7hyffyaVOkX8z8TVgobcECM1cjqQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:468d:b0:1df:39da:322b with SMTP id z13-20020a17090a468d00b001df39da322bmr1779978pjf.137.1654754745487; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 23:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a13-20020a170902710d00b0015e8d4eb1d2sm15765575pll.28.2022.06.08.23.05.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Jun 2022 23:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-CBCC4FC7-32FD-458E-8B9D-5E2F8A992C39"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 23:05:43 -0700
Message-Id: <8F2F8D96-EDB7-4ECA-AB0E-B316F6770CFB@gmail.com>
References: <A7C54708-0C2D-45B2-B433-A27A34B3656C@cisco.com>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <A7C54708-0C2D-45B2-B433-A27A34B3656C@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19F77)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/TyOZIgvHYwF6JU_eKLhyoBq7a4s>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 06:05:50 -0000

I support the adoption.
Do I like further pollution of BGP (which I contributed to)?  not really, however this is an opinion, in reality - I operate one of the largest networks in the world, and my company has invested millions of $$ and is extensively using BGP-LS. With all the best intentions - here we are.
I’m aware of at least 2 implementations that can stream LSDB over a much better transport, however this seems not to gain any popularity, that’s it.

Cheers,
Jeff

> On Jun 7, 2022, at 05:32, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> I support WG adoption – the corresponding LSR draft has completed WG last call and is awaiting AD review.
>  
> Thanks,
> Acee
>  
> From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
> Date: Monday, June 6, 2022 at 5:28 PM
> To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Idr] draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01 - WG adoption call (6/6 to 6/20)
>  
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr-01.txt
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-head-idr-bgp-ls-isis-fr/
>  
>   This document defines one new BGP-LS (BGP Link-State) TLV for
>    Flood Reflection to match the ISIS TLV for flood reduction.
>  
>    The draft is short (5 total pages). 
>  
> Since this BGP-LS feature has been adopted by IS-IS,
> Please consider
>  
> 1.       Is there any technical difficulty with adding this to the BGP-LS code points?
> 2.   Is this draft ready for publication?
> 3.   Does this addition help operational networks.
>  
> Cheers, Sue Hares
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email