IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25

"Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com> Thu, 24 September 2020 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jheitz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21D63A15E7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=AIAQ7ZF1; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=cCQPuASw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zrtCgguZBmqD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C628F3A15E4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=21098; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1600906759; x=1602116359; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=fyR+GzIbWD3i0otjpfTIzhIw5IJnBM5xWCmRNTfAk84=; b=AIAQ7ZF14/OHmfTn8V0QW5cZ6khBW6wj+2HX2U98v35gRRGHO49IjIOz OWxEYQHvcUIyLaia5YdNMiYDiaQ1BUmDdRvT3T/XFQ3AZXKa8tS0uXYar v7BsQEft3K5Z4D8OmX5Q6owQy8u4grtlvdaTAtgM/wD5wUx69NJr283mE 0=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:wOU5XBxEC2ptuBHXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRWBt+9kl03UXsPd5u4Xw+bVsqW1X2sG7N7BtX0Za5VDWlcDjtlehA0vBsOJSCiZZP7nZiA3BoJOAVli+XzoK0FOCtv9IVvfvi764TsbAB6qMw1zK6z8EZLTiMLi0ee09tXTbgxEiSD7b6l1KUC9rB7asY8dho4xJw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CyCADA5Wtf/5ldJa1gHgEBCxIMggQLgSMvUQdwWS8shDqDRgONepQIhG6CUwNVCwEBAQ0BAS0CBAEBhEsCF4ITAiQ3Bg4CAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthVwMhXIBAQEEEgsGChMBATcBDwIBCBEEAQEoAwICAjAUCQgCBA4FCAwOgwWBfk0DLgGrcQKBOYhhdoEygwEBAQWFNBiCEAmBOIJxg2mGUhuBQT+BVIJNPoEEgVgEgV80gmEzgi2ES45rhn6LeJELCoJnmnShCa5ThCwCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWokN4EgcBU7gmlQFwINjh8MFxSDOopWdAI1AgYKAQEDCXyNYwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,296,1596499200"; d="scan'208,217";a="547728728"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 24 Sep 2020 00:19:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08O0JGYV024316 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:19:16 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 19:19:16 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 19:19:15 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:19:15 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Yzqk0EQfGBQ//hwmH+gl6lxWbsTQbi+8KRnLAcnzTjsxQrz+XTtGPBe8G1+eLefCIY/MVgv1gpsWafF+uh3eG3TcI+1XZUrVT0dOzRjZYTpD5fsIfL/V3KSlreOr2yGiMhN+cFXY3ZObraGD0hv95C+/UHogYOmTzIWXL65KQaZC2J3FJb90IqJxfjxAvOkGTbX5ykOaFL58m3sNeSJix9KmwfCsosx4sNTGSfRvFVA3pagoZfyeVXIqJqnLpbwQOeSNLP9GbLvRfdu6AUBBEWDL6k9ORI4u7ndDBXD0xVxbopqP3ByrZRnyJ4HFSiUGGNdYH//K6bSpjtv6cPBjWA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=fyR+GzIbWD3i0otjpfTIzhIw5IJnBM5xWCmRNTfAk84=; b=ELDKS+MfkpxqIUc0ZGT3+ffSvVBcvRSztQWbdOgEYNVtRoFPlljRteXrqlS0YdrQ6uoXtJ1hg8OZ/zr+MqBEhRcsmkpDZvlW9EMtrJ23ttJKf+hAN4biY190CDH9JDCHtocJWZT9e2+FKrHg4y9UrAXGBiEzW77BFJzYmElgvzV/dITg2thhH0Gy/FwNjAqy01yDfC0slNEGwBvxYhXqOogLiZ4HMhTGGUAEWdjvCKK35Ka5oYsw+0VxO5JrqE8TtrhylmWr4BK8naSA7pBLCb9MU3aAvjrf0zeFlqbRRWxI45+6IHcSMbHjufPFxqz/jL2B16nPx3h/x0lZZwYYcg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=fyR+GzIbWD3i0otjpfTIzhIw5IJnBM5xWCmRNTfAk84=; b=cCQPuASwhORn8ZPeqoVLBmAyc122+a7NRVVn+QPbUs4HHlDFIMmf6jlYTyBJwuwnZmI6rvU+VXBlyM3FK12dbuTCFX0g/L0hFEoytiCVKK0Ti3dI2m2N1SGTtaU2rGuMnNlrufUJErP8FgCnDeOvw+XQhzONkZOj7S+cauUUO7A=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:7c::14) by BYAPR11MB3094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:87::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3391.14; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:19:14 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::80d9:6be4:2116:c79c]) by BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::80d9:6be4:2116:c79c%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3391.026; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:19:14 +0000
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
CC: John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, IDR List <idr@ietf.org>, Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@hostinger.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25
Thread-Index: AQHWkdxqWJsJMUkNjE2iUdlgS0jkFql2pHSAgAAmIfCAAAJQAIAABuAwgAABjICAABOz8A==
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:19:14 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB320752E429390546F74C3378C0390@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <081E5E98-8D7B-452E-8517-EECBE72E3D7F@juniper.net> <8EFAFA50-BEAC-4F8C-A2CB-293225B3D529@juniper.net> <CAOj+MMGdSR0+yrzdgLdNhTVVsnO6ZLbNrv_oLiENTdy5f1X-KA@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR11MB3207A79B591B031EFA6ECAD9C0380@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMH6eeik9Ci3oaCKHNyCJO4_xWSQ8BKAosAR1u+myBciBQ@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR11MB32076B0F38E44C5BD304DCD0C0380@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MME183PD43hqxQNPdx7Q2gi3fEv7eCcpG3_mbB9YNmHd9g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MME183PD43hqxQNPdx7Q2gi3fEv7eCcpG3_mbB9YNmHd9g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: raszuk.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;raszuk.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2601:647:5701:46e0:4442:2ff5:c2b8:2f02]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1dea15db-7e54-4319-7f30-08d8601f77dd
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3094:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB3094E5ECE8CE9E94B74BB00CC0390@BYAPR11MB3094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:3826;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 4g4uTZ26y00rKjfXgb+AY0r5p4KAvPiv0rKSWFh7eJNWoWXVkm1Ia/YdIcDhbDzHRSRDRzR1iQKg12iTGNVb4y95cxnsBXslui/TK98CKiDoBk3FlFRkB41ToNBCAuV6qWDVZ4nrHB4GIDGlxyTcgVpESmGI70SR/c687VzHgmwDE8XZARBb/hW7DPAPE2WeQ0tnR1zM4/AeFAoce6uO0G1QQxdwQM4xZdKP7//QRaEy8B0ifMNltW7P9vqdePoqz0LWbCFBzYpTsgNB/ts8O7sZ6oR0a0CztOke6TkXTFy5DY+0nsMC1O8/z7GGcTHvtJBoEtzlb2CyttQvAQMYQTc/Eea6+zFeVP6ZdREbNzvB/y/iOZ28U6ikb0KY5CW2
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(366004)(136003)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(5660300002)(9686003)(55016002)(6506007)(53546011)(71200400001)(33656002)(7696005)(86362001)(52536014)(4326008)(478600001)(76116006)(83380400001)(8936002)(316002)(186003)(66946007)(8676002)(66556008)(66476007)(6916009)(2906002)(64756008)(66446008)(54906003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR11MB320752E429390546F74C3378C0390BYAPR11MB3207namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1dea15db-7e54-4319-7f30-08d8601f77dd
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Sep 2020 00:19:14.2485 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: jSShnibyusQHjKWgmANNQs9dRfKQbeDaOM77u7G6yZvPxjPjZvwEyDG3nzlJIOZQaTCoOCXMa2CwEgjCxkR4kA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3094
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.13, xch-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/FEtZ04XAWz1ja9V9mE2y7vhlvIg>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:19:23 -0000

I just took a look at it.
It was 8 years ago, before my time at Cisco.
It is a muddle of TLVs and I so hate coding up endless sets of TLVs. and then debugging them.
The world has moved on. Can we use a layer 6 protocol, like JSON or google protobufs now?
Also, it has request/reply messages. That's no longer operational messages.
That makes it a protocol. It makes the receiving party do work.
BGP is used to message between devices belonging to different entities.
Entities do not like doing free work for other entities.

If we were to reincarnate operational messages, could we modernize it and remove the request/reply?

Regards,
Jakob.

From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 3:55 PM
To: Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz@cisco.com>
Cc: John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>; IDR List <idr@ietf.org>; Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@hostinger.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25

Hi Jakob,

It was getting very good community support. Just lack of implementations by vendors as required by IDR to progress it.

Willing to hello with that one from yr side ?

Thx,
R.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 12:50 AM Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz@cisco.com<mailto:jheitz@cisco.com>> wrote:
Robert,

I don't remember, why did the operational message not move forward?

Regards,
Jakob.

From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 3:25 PM
To: Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz@cisco.com<mailto:jheitz@cisco.com>>
Cc: John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>>; IDR List <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>; Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@hostinger.com<mailto:donatas.abraitis@hostinger.com>>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25

Hey Jakob,

I never said this does not provide value.

But there is much more operational messages which I hope many will agree that they also provide value.

With that said do you want to put all of this into capabilities, just because it is easy to do ?

Cheers,
R.


On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 12:18 AM Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz@cisco.com<mailto:jheitz@cisco.com>> wrote:
I support it, because it provides value.

I can see it actually getting done (and not wasting everyone's time), because it's easy to do.

Regards,
Jakob.

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 1:00 PM
To: John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Cc: IDR List <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>; Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@hostinger.com<mailto:donatas.abraitis@hostinger.com>>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25


Frankly I have not seen much support except from Jakob for encoding it in capabilities. And that support comes mainly from the fact that "it is easy to do".

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status