IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Thu, 12 January 2023 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B9FC16ECA3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:43:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EG0jpauEm0J8 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:43:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C809C15C51B for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:43:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 076F21E399; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:43:17 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DFFC33C6-F29D-43A9-A979-B7A95AA7B909"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <C264E12E-08DE-4C90-AF36-C0B477825DFE@juniper.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:43:17 -0500
Cc: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@hostinger.com>, "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <C1440ECE-A13C-42BD-A025-6B9DED3AC0E1@pfrc.org>
References: <CAOj+MMG9BuCBjATYNKO5H0oFUipCE8iBU+DJ0FLDDUZdp+nM3Q@mail.gmail.com> <C9D01C45-90BD-465D-B2C4-0CCA6B2A21A3@juniper.net> <CAOj+MMFrke5-9+pMKZ7QTawiOT+N3fD=2ta8hGEu=CG+qv_OQw@mail.gmail.com> <C264E12E-08DE-4C90-AF36-C0B477825DFE@juniper.net>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/LY8zCmhXQzlv9Dk8z_5dK6BJhQA>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 18:43:23 -0000

John,


> On Jan 12, 2023, at 1:24 PM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> FWIW, as far as I know, the behavior permitted by the paragraph you quote has never been used. If that’s true, it might not be a bad idea to do an update of RFC 5492 that removes the paragraph and deprecates the Unsupported Capability error code entirely, to avoid future generations going through the same confusion. If the WG wants to do this, I’d be willing to participate, although the first step would be to do a survey to make sure nobody actually is making use of the feature and I’d want someone else to lead on that.

The example cited, "I really want ipv6", is a good motivation for "negotiate this, or hang up".  I don't think we'll ever want it gone from the spec.

There's perhaps room for grow to tell us "don't do this for reasonable combinations of operationally used knobs".

-- Jeff

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status