IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-languages] Proposal for variant language subtags for German dialects

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Mon, 30 October 2023 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD84C15106A for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.242
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.242 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ccil-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uBFMOJ6IUkzs for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.mail.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A6E4C151072 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.27; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:17:34 -0700
Received: from aesmt112-co-1-2.serverpod.net (10.224.74.76) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.129) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.27 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:17:34 -0700
Received: from aesc112-co-1-2.serverpod.net (aesc112-co-1-2.serverpod.net [10.224.76.91]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by aesmt112-co-1.serverpod.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E24BE120003 for <ietf-languages@ex.icann.org>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exmx112-co-1-1.serverpod.net (exmx112-co-1-1.serverpod.net [10.224.72.73]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by aesmt112-co-1.serverpod.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD48B120002 for <ietf-languages@ex.icann.org>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pechora1.lax.icann.org (pechora1.icann.org [192.0.33.71]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by west.smtp.mx.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A632180002 for <ietf-languages@ex.icann.org>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92f.google.com (mail-ua1-x92f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pechora1.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31757700032E for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:17:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92f.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-7ba05f119d3so1654273241.0 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccil-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1698668232; x=1699273032; darn=iana.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=m2bWx3nUnEH4MsrzI5t6KiKWLZvgaZY4qW6E1d3c2OQ=; b=Dke+ANUaqgKf47WMiCKpJuwAJ979OmlQ5YmQaDvvh6enMtmHCv3SfOajvMiU+3/VRb 4KdmxcoeItTzDDSicfNirvCeGwWtpsF3bLMRRWU5Xp95WS06XBHqO8FCJCkBi0PhdKl/ iY7I2nVn/ZNorw5latJ0zGniaqGIlFLvDt6UzsRjevXTnZXpsjKeFvJs46qXrGeMqJzx yDaM0UIkLwJoZERuQQ17NGILby/igcLHtgaPzdOVSiZ48NzvsF92J93nEyglJJ8zfCew GItUiCx90wPnBzeMBo7nSikDCg05qrZuVVJhYJp/B0Qycin6cp738hofv51SXibVyYfZ we8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698668232; x=1699273032; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=m2bWx3nUnEH4MsrzI5t6KiKWLZvgaZY4qW6E1d3c2OQ=; b=rEyedzc+RBCyR1ZeJjlssy8IrwbJ+EDz/fBGQUxdPpdqcjMdV24hq54+K/uT1Isu55 pYIXvt/b5kCRk2wFX1QcL3advGQu+ZBjPv1oUrrTTPUfr7eYuVKpkiq7EVyNn4F5J+aa M80GxJI1fQokoY5NmsQ03OMxiQCeAYbQfu+EiAdJxk3dDlyZlKxiEhSD6Pl3nK1xhlLP q2+0vfyvXLZ6vQBi/ZUVdNzQ/xEqq4Ck8mwk1Mvbeqk4b+rMzgcYpl3cSwXxmG4nm6T9 F+6c4pqo1P09j2YZSB1F6f+4DgVcYZMj9cLvWQtLeudpvGsAqzN3yIMl2TBWl36uXYWz IDpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzgB17Ra0sLFo0Nz6pJuI60KTtFV1TtYTsReqLeB/WGCMWjzzvI yXv0SZi0R0nDzQ1gEb8xsY19RO8lAZxlwIy1Ol/Exg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHACM2WGm/wcPx8mO40RC5VU+yKTfjw+KdwaTe9wMWALCe2OLsGaQIH8t1P/NkMGf4qJ1S9xY6wCEvowEFVCHI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:4d10:b0:495:f495:bab1 with SMTP id fi16-20020a0561224d1000b00495f495bab1mr6796859vkb.0.1698668232060; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 05:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD2gp_QbJ6pSuUkLWFBhLd_CvY95+ph=+B6uFS+YtNhqG7rh1g@mail.gmail.com> <E1CDAC00-9A83-419B-8508-BCB85EB36508@bahnhof.se>
In-Reply-To: <E1CDAC00-9A83-419B-8508-BCB85EB36508@bahnhof.se>
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 08:17:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2gp_R6=k75jS63XUbKZWBc4YG_JKSSf=ThnbKtkYiz4TrciA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kent Karlsson <kent.b.karlsson@bahnhof.se>
Cc: IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000090514d0608ee048e"
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=UvJwis8B c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=653f9ede a=4hrTe8xcFnigCrauA2tCjw==:117 a=4hrTe8xcFnigCrauA2tCjw==:17 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=bhdUkHdE2iEA:10 a=2tsvuTQuAAAA:8 a=Dm6VUK_eh7odJhkDw8oA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=gnpYM1gBbpg3Oi-XSdIA:9 a=4gK6mQIHu4lvklyh:21 a=lqcHg5cX4UMA:10 a=w1QI8THEI4iyJQ0oNEIE:22
X-SOURCE-IP: 192.0.33.71
X-SPF-STATUS: soft_fail
X-SPF-FROM-STATUS: not_checked
X-RDNS-STATUS: pass
X-HELO-STRING: pechora1.lax.icann.org
Spam-Stopper-Id: b51b06bb-cc6d-460a-a23e-fc378dd5e214
Spam-Stopper-v2: Yes
X-Envelope-Mail-From: cowan@ccil.org
X-AES-Analytics-Data: eyJ0aW1lc3RhbXAiOiAiMjAyMy0xMC0zMFQxMjoxNzozNC44NDJaIiwgIm1lc3NhZ2VUcmFja2luZyI6IHsiaGFuZGxpbmciOiBbIlRISVJEIFBBUlRZIEJZUEFTUyJdLCAidW5pZmllZENhdGVnb3J5IjogIlVOQ0FURUdPUklTRUQifSwgImVuZ2luZXMiOiB7fX0=
X-Spam-Category: None
X-Spam-Reasons: None
X-AES-Category: LEGIT
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, OOF, AutoReply
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/HWDu6I9mR5qai4giRjloMbdECow>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Proposal for variant language subtags for German dialects
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Review of requests for language tag registration according to BCP 47 \(RFC 4646\)" <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:17:37 -0000

I'm okay either way with pommer or pomer, but the focus here was to get the
prefix correct.  "Pommeranian" isn't English, so I fixed it.  All of the
OED's quotations, whether about Germans, Kashubs, the territory itself, or
the dogs, are spelled "Pomeranian", probably a hybrid of German "Pommern"
and Polish "Pomorze".   Sometimes we find "Pomoranian" for
Kashubian/Cassubian/Kaszub)ian) to distinguish it from "Pomeranian" for the
Germanic variety. but this seems to be obsolete.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 7:57 AM Kent Karlsson <kent.b.karlsson@bahnhof.se>
wrote:

> But still double m in the subtags?
>
> /Kent K
>
> Skickat från min iPhone
>
> > 30 okt. 2023 kl. 03:40 skrev John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>:
> >
> > "Pomeranian (with one "m").
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email