RE: wadegile and pinyin LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORMs

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Thu, 04 September 2008 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <petercon@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DEC39E45D for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 02:32:55 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yGf4FGOjnPk8 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 02:32:54 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.6.8
Received: from pechora2.lax.icann.org (pechora2.icann.org [208.77.188.37]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6294F39E05E for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Thu, 4 Sep 2008 02:32:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mailb.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by pechora2.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m840WvAx029223 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:33:17 -0700
Received: from tk5-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.88.96) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.291.1; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:32:56 -0700
Received: from NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.44]) by tk5-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.88.96]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:32:56 -0700
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:32:53 -0700
Subject: RE: wadegile and pinyin LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORMs
Thread-Topic: wadegile and pinyin LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORMs
Thread-Index: AckOES37c1bNqhBDQImIHwBu2MRlWQAE/c4g
Message-ID: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB835795633B2E3D9E@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB835795633B2E3A54@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <AF7C3D24-CE55-408B-843D-5213A3E34A8C@evertype.com>
In-Reply-To: <AF7C3D24-CE55-408B-843D-5213A3E34A8C@evertype.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/8152/Wed Sep 3 14:17:58 2008 on pechora2.lax.icann.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (pechora2.lax.icann.org [208.77.188.37]); Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Language tag discussions <ietf-languages.alvestrand.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:32:55 -0000

From: ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson

>> No, I (or some process) does not *need* to know. For analogy,
>> that's like saying that Unicode implementations need to be able
>> to interpret and process U+A866 correctly, which clearly is not
>> what that standard requires.
>
> I don't know what you mean by "interpret" or "process", never
> mind "correctly".

If that's the case, then it seems to me you're not in a position to make a judgment in your capacity of LSTR based on your own opinion: your opinion is not based on a qualified technical understanding of BCP47.


>> No more does BCP47 require that implementations must know that
>> "wadegile" and "pinyin" imply Latin.
>
> Neither can imply anything else. They are Latin orthograpies.

You, as an informed human, know that. Processes written in software do not.



Peter