Re: Pinyin

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Wed, 24 September 2008 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D9539E674 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:36:09 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rGGXCkRw-WOu for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:36:08 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.6.8
Received: from pechora2.lax.icann.org (pechora2.icann.org [208.77.188.37]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A205339E46F for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:36:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.69]) by pechora2.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8OHaGF5011575 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:36:36 -0700
Received: from [64.105.34.116] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1KiYHg-0007Z0-1u for ietf-languages@iana.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:36:16 -0400
Message-ID: <009201c91e6c$1e0adf20$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: ietf-languages@iana.org
References: <83C5E5CB-FE27-47BA-A98F-F5003F586A64@evertype.com><006e01c91e68$9e4abce0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <20080924172101.GU19886@mercury.ccil.org>
Subject: Re: Pinyin
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:36:45 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d88858bc2ddbf51b90e407618edc2b475b00a7914e467a7d3038350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 64.105.34.116
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/8324/Wed Sep 24 03:55:43 2008 on pechora2.lax.icann.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (pechora2.lax.icann.org [208.77.188.37]); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Language tag discussions <ietf-languages.alvestrand.no>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@alvestrand.no?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:36:09 -0000

Hi -

> From: "John Cowan" <cowan@ccil.org>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
> Cc: <ietf-languages@iana.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Pinyin
...
> > Now, a question.  Consider bo-Latn-TW-pinyin.  Would that be  Tibetan
> > as used in Tiawan in an orthography that looks something like Hanyu Pinyin,
> > or Tibetan in an orthography that looks something like Tongyong pinyin?
> 
> Who cares?  It is complete bollocks in either case, as much so as nv-DK or tlh-AQ.

I'm serious.

Does anyone know which (if any) Tibetan Romanizations are in use in
Taiwan (e.g., in teaching) and whether they differ in any material way
from the ones already discussed here?

I'm also trying to understand the generative properties of the proposal.
Does the bit of information that something is based on Tongyong,
rather than Hanyu Pinyin, come (generatlively) from the -TW-pinyin
part of the tag or does it come (non-generatively) from the list
"zh-Latn-TW-pinyin, zh-TW-pinyin"?

Randy