IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-languages] Tongyong Pinyin bites the dust (was: Pinyin)

Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> Tue, 01 January 2019 23:32 UTC

Return-Path: <doug@ewellic.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95F41200B3 for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:32:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L9LI2atwudpp for <ietf-languages@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:32:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ADA7127133 for <ietf-languages@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:32:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) id 7C6F07C59A1; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:32:18 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6390D7C56C9 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:32:18 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68BpR-tWoLF8 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:32:15 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
X-Comment: SPF skipped for whitelisted relay - client-ip=192.0.46.72; helo=pechora6.dc.icann.org; envelope-from=doug@ewellic.org; receiver=ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Received: from pechora6.dc.icann.org (pechora6.icann.org [192.0.46.72]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4D667C3C42 for <ietf-languages@alvestrand.no>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:32:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from p3plsmtpa06-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa06-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pechora6.dc.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 351AB1E03F7 for <ietf-languages@iana.org>; Tue, 1 Jan 2019 23:32:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::ffff:10.0.0.167] ([73.229.14.229]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id eTVOgZKTMSUw0eTVhgXcRR; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 16:31:52 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com>, IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages@iana.org>
From: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 16:31:46 -0700
Importance: normal
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <522DF494-A5BF-4508-93EC-F3138B9D2F7C@evertype.com>
References: <mailman.5643.1221690552.6324.ietf-languages@alvestrand.no> <2652D8C8A8F14C8C85834B9FD2383AC2@DGBP7M81> <20080918030403.GL4058@mercury.ccil.org> <522DF494-A5BF-4508-93EC-F3138B9D2F7C@evertype.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_95F8B0C0-2DD8-4BD5-B8C2-67519F1A31B1_"
X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (pechora6.dc.icann.org [192.0.46.72]); Tue, 01 Jan 2019 23:32:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfF2JBv5jb8MfLyUF4j2rtH3KAMmvHE/e4WD9UO5sL2vEdEVxyZmNCEl6OK1lUhp7K5VqIdZKNem4D1R2RCVxIxhD4xdBY+qX5/QpuZ5CK1Rdh8IYksye 3rkZy95TQGoaS379nrzyxHzkjbKLi7Be8ivJmma9IUCbg8zRDSyjv4B7v4IvdgFbbSh+HAlZ4SHrbOrDFpaBizolTn1JNB+Ana3FJy8C+qR0XKeJ9JN7m5M/
Message-Id: <20190101233218.6390D7C56C9@mork.alvestrand.no>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-languages/qhJyWATHFH5vQA1a9Lzqu80IpTc>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Tongyong Pinyin bites the dust (was: Pinyin)
X-BeenThere: ietf-languages@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-languages.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-languages/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-languages@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages>, <mailto:ietf-languages-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 23:32:24 -0000

I’m not going to fight this proposal. I just wanted to make sure the discussion 10 years ago was considered.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org

From: Michael Everson
Sent: Tuesday, January 1, 2019 14:42
To: IETF Languages Discussion
Subject: Re: [Ietf-languages] Tongyong Pinyin bites the dust (was: Pinyin)

No one had asked for it though.

M

> On 18 Sep 2008, at 04:04, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote:
> 
> Doug Ewell scripsit:
> 
>> Unfortunately, this doesn't cause all existing Tongyong Pinyin content 
>> to vanish off the earth, and so if there was a need to tag Tongyong 
>> content before, that need has not gone away.
> 
> True.  But it also means that we don't have to worry about how to
> represent Tongyong at this stage, since no one has asked for it.  We can
> decide later or never.
> 
> -- 
> John Cowan   cowan@ccil.org

_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email