IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard

Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> Thu, 16 July 2015 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <edward.lewis@icann.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBB71A21B6; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5XWYzuh_YOaC; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B024E1A21B4; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:50:24 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:50:24 -0700
From: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
To: Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg>, Joe Hildebrand <hildjj@cursive.net>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHQvmrz3HvFHNRIO06SM+I8NqN9Up3b3ICAgAAJZwCAAGDdgIABUUoAgAD/DYCAAB+fAA==
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:50:23 +0000
Message-ID: <D1CD82AB.D149%edward.lewis@icann.org>
References: <20150714192438.1138.96059.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMAz1ogcpWAdKaKTRm9f8sV4RO+TKu6aYB717D7+eM0bmw@mail.gmail.com> <20150714205019.GA20641@sources.org> <93AA7CD2-DFC0-419C-9103-F39AA711BD79@virtualized.org> <CF44E5A4-B5CC-4D7A-BAD8-D2989AAC96BE@cursive.net> <CA+cU71m+fxMPuJs67_azCfF+u2uMn05Q3PXtT7uDXvtNWFA9vw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+cU71m+fxMPuJs67_azCfF+u2uMn05Q3PXtT7uDXvtNWFA9vw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.3.150624
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3519906616_21032563"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/28ggU5Tw0xjM35odmNkhAjzheVs>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:10:02 -0700
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:50:28 -0000

On 7/16/15, 9:57, "DNSOP on behalf of Tom Ritter" <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
on behalf of tom@ritter.vg> wrote:

>On 16 July 2015 at 00:44, Joe Hildebrand <hildjj@cursive.net> wrote:
>> I don't see any mention of the CAB Forum stuff in the draft.  Has anyone
>> done the analysis to see if CAB Forum members really will issue certs to
>> .onion addresses if we do this?  Do they issue certs for .example or
>>.local
>> today?
>
>Not only will they issue certificates .onion, but they will not be
>required to revoke the certificates they have _already_ issued, and
>are using happily....
>On the topics of metrics, indeed https://metrics.torproject.org/...

I'd be happy (happier) if that information appeared in the draft.


>On the topic of carrot...

I don't have any users.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email