IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 20 July 2015 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C451B3002 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4pvI9uWvlCpW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27FAF1B2FE8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-04.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11CDEDA008B; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 17:57:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.20.218] (71.233.41.235) by CAS-04.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:57:54 -0700
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_22CD59CA-4F64-4EF6-9B3B-28386B75479A"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5AD7A8CCF5852BB1CE0AC1@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:57:53 -0400
Message-ID: <DCB0DEDD-9B0F-4103-BA28-4265F20F9BAA@nominum.com>
References: <CD5AD7A8CCF5852BB1CE0AC1@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.41.235]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9ld97ETaRNl2egiBfty0vUMB4ws>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 17:57:56 -0000

On Jul 20, 2015, at 1:15 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> I agree with your analysis, modulo one question.  You make the
> comment that CLASSes don't really work, as have others.  I'd
> like to understand it better. 

To understand why classes don’t work, can you tell me what a URL for a name in a non-IN class would look like?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email