Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sun, 26 July 2015 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43301B2A7B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 02:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eRm6p4Up8et7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 02:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A21A41B2A73 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 02:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE08BE9C; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:52:02 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A1Qrenn5Mfxu; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:52:01 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.73] (unknown [86.46.19.103]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37AD6BE8E; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:52:01 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1437904321; bh=IoylrZDvNq5N+rezk7l7YmYVrIrUWd8+sSrR3NvECsU=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=q5BVjuqEgeqxs9irR+Rq0lsDvbRPSuHlaMOa3Wv/b2gdDcw5iemjMYswsDLRymKbz DdGbHAm3TvNkikDEWn7ZN7sm9jMBMWGh6FzDP/vudZRZ8b8q5iq6f44NcI0YZ2sYae hWNe8ckr9s5Pmut1hScsQqUT/LuYRmMJ7z/XMgm8=
Message-ID: <55B4ADC0.90102@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:52:00 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
References: <20150725165829.76805.qmail@ary.lan> <413CD2A31E4AFF293091DD05@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <DM2PR0301MB065582F1A4F6854EF86D4C8AA8800@DM2PR0301MB0655.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <7E083C9C-E747-49E0-BEDC-A3F62FF922F6@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <7E083C9C-E747-49E0-BEDC-A3F62FF922F6@nominum.com>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LOHpcS34Z8ZP8_O2EGtkzj6vSIk>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 09:52:04 -0000


On 26/07/15 01:09, Ted Lemon wrote:
> This has been discussed earlier in the conversation. 

Not aiming at Ted alone, I have to say that I'm seeing an awful lot
of repetition in this discussion.

Perhaps it's past time we only sent messages with novel arguments or
facts not already raised here or in dnsop?

S.