Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> Wed, 15 July 2015 12:42 UTC
Return-Path: <edward.lewis@icann.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B371A8AB3; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 05:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bz379Qo9pX-8; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 05:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 256A71A8AA8; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 05:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 05:42:23 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 05:42:23 -0700
From: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHQvmrz3HvFHNRIO06SM+I8NqN9Up3crNMA
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:42:23 +0000
Message-ID: <D1CBC489.D039%edward.lewis@icann.org>
References: <20150714192438.1138.96059.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150714192438.1138.96059.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.3.150624
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3519794538_18320374"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PqixtsSU9LufwbdZwt1y0iQZl8M>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:55:08 -0700
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:42:28 -0000
On 7/14/15, 15:24: >The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG >(dnsop) to consider the following document: >- 'The .onion Special-Use Domain Name' > <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> as Proposed Standard Having read the document plus Ted Hardie's and David Conrad's (who happens to be my boss in real life) comments, I see the documentation as insufficient. As David says, .onion-names use is independent (to some extent) on whether "onion" is registered in the Special Use Domain Names registry. What I am writing here isn't a statement about whether "onion" is to registered, but about the document applying for registration. The document defines the use of the name by referring to a couple of references, none of which appears to be published in a way that can be referenced except by URL. Not to say that the documents seen are poorly written, still there's no evidence of peer review nor stable reference point. (One reference is a well prepared PDF, loaded on Jan 23, 2013 with many other documents to a website that itself has this blurb at the bottom: "Historical page reflecting onion-router.net as of 2005, not regularly maintained. Address questions to...") This is not a critique of the content of the PDF, just the ability to rely on it for a decision. The document also shows no evidence of the deployment of the use of the names below "onion." In David's email, and in others, there are comments regarding an "installed base". I've only seen any discussion about an installed base in email, this is not in the documents. In (say) 50 years, what matters is what is in the published RFC, not the mailing lists. Presence in the documents being put forward is important. (E.g., has anyone consulted the annual DNS-OARC DITL data to measure how often "onion" names are seen at root servers during that collection?) Drilling into the criteria that are presented. Not all of them. 1. Users. The draft states "human users are expected to recognize .onion names as..." How are users supposed to recognize them as (special)? In as much as the document says nothing about evidence of deployment and adoption, how can an expectation be developed? If I hadn't been reading the thread on DNSOP, I wouldn't have thought "onion" was special - but I live in a cave, so what I think isn't important. 4. Caching DNS Servers and 5. Authoritative DNS Servers I really believe that for DNS elements, there should be no change. By intent, the onion names are not to be presented to the DNS by what's in category 2 and 3 (Applications and Name Resolution API's respectively). I see placing any requirement on DNS elements - and by that I mean the software used to implement the DNS standard - as a bad idea, under the heading of "permanent fix to a temporary situation." (I.e., Tor may not be permanent, if it is, as software matures onion names will not be in DNS queries.) 6. DNS Operators Having had experience with that field, I don't see this being a reliable "rule." In general, when a customer loads a zone into a system, there's no way to check whether they have the "right" to use the name. This is more an issue I have with RFC 6761 and in general how the documents are used in operations than a comment on the "onion" application. Nevertheless, I wouldn't rely rule on operators, given that anyone can set up a name server (the code is free and privileged user accounts are easy on laptops), to be an effective means to enforce name restrictions. 7. DNS Registrars/Registries This is the place where a case should be made for the registering "onion" as a Special Use Domain Name. Given the story to date, that "onion" is not to be in the DNS, then don't change the protocol (5,6 above) but then set up barriers to putting it in the DNS (7 here). If you do that, then Name Resolution libraries (3 above) will return "name error" or NXDOMAIN to all queries in the onion domain of names. I see this as where registry policy documents can "point" (by reference) to a list of names that are specially reserved or restricted. I'm agreeing with Ted in that this application is insufficient. I'm agreeing with David in that designating "onion" in such a way as to fix the "CAB Forum" stuff is acceptable. My concern is that, if this application proceeds as documented, the precedent being set could be regrettable.
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Hardie
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Hardie
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… George Michaelson
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Hardie
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Randy Bush
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Patrik Fältström
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Patrik Fältström
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Patrik Fältström
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Hardie
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Hardie
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Hardie
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… John C Klensin
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Edward Lewis
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Edward Lewis
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Joe Hildebrand
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Joe Hildebrand
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… John Levine
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Mark Andrews
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… John R Levine
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Patrik Fältström
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… John C Klensin
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Tom Ritter
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Richard Barnes
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Eliot Lear
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Richard Barnes
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Hardie
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… David Cake
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… David Cake
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… David Cake
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Eliot Lear
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Alec Muffett
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… John C Klensin
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John Levine
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Lemon
- Re: domain names that aren't DNS names, was Last … John Levine
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… George Michaelson
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Geoff Huston
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Eliot Lear
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Suzanne Woolf
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … George Michaelson
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Eliot Lear
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Suzanne Woolf
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Douglas Otis
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Eliot Lear
- Re: domain names that aren't DNS names, was Last … Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… George Michaelson
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… David Conrad
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Tim Wicinski
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Lemon
- Weakness of DNS classes (was Re: Last Call: <draf… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Weakness of DNS classes (was Re: Last Call: <… John C Klensin
- Re: domain names that are not DNS names, was Last… John Levine
- Re: domain names that are not DNS names, was Last… Ted Lemon
- Re: Weakness of DNS classes (was Re: Last Call: <… John Levine
- Re: Weakness of DNS classes (was Re: Last Call: <… David Morris
- Re: Weakness of DNS classes (was Re: Last Call: <… Mark Andrews
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… John C Klensin
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John Curran
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Ted Lemon
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John C Klensin
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Steve Crocker
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … David Conrad
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Ted Lemon
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Dave Crocker
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John C Klensin
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Dave Crocker
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … David Conrad
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Eliot Lear
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … David Conrad
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Eliot Lear
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Donald Eastlake
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John Curran
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Richard Shockey
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Ted Lemon
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Ted Lemon
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John R Levine
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John Levine
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John Levine
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Ted Lemon
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Eliot Lear
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Patrik Fältström
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Patrik Fältström
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John R Levine
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Patrik Fältström
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John R Levine
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Patrik Fältström
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John C Klensin
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John Levine
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John C Klensin
- RE: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Christian Huitema
- RE: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John C Klensin
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Ted Lemon
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Andrew Sullivan
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Stephen Farrell
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Ted Lemon
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John C Klensin
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Patrik Fältström
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John C Klensin
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Patrik Fältström
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … John Levine
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Wendy Seltzer
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Edward Lewis
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Chris Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Hardie
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Ted Hardie
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Joe Hildebrand
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Alec Muffett
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Andrew Sullivan
- RE: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Darcy Kevin (FCA)
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Sam Hartman
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Peter Koch
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Alec Muffett
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Hardie
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Alec Muffett
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Hardie
- Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Alec Muffett
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Ted Hardie
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Alec Muffett
- RE: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tl… Darcy Kevin (FCA)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… Nick Mathewson
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt… George Michaelson
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Ted Lemon
- Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was … Dave Crocker