IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 03:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD2A1A8A10 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s_zrpFaY5ytW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100BD1A00E5 for <IETF@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so10120913wic.1 for <IETF@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6sEtAuBceWyhSlRTLDmOgHX6qEBu/+p52TfEaKgA0Ns=; b=vlKmnjCOWBZFcOEeu07qs5R3wr0+JR40ogSyB5nNNFnssqH2EHgtG2kkmQjXJRT9Oy AnXOIb7F6obnV4cm/ChfsHX/jEX2tb2nQGkGdk9VZZ5uV3uTXiGBFk8kIaiSaSr609o8 pabgok3CBLE2YqRlh3mU/SShwbLN1+DvmA5GNenP2e5vHpoqpTUkcM2j0AzIC6fDs25F Cz2xZAAGEDDCwNm1SlmKaPRbx0xU2Tc9H48Gj0XrazjSVFvwjMS/ZZlY3Lbzw19aIpkU 5DC2LVDcEqR7uP8Q4hEOmbnvZdQkYUWIUHsJwAjvaWGqwim5OYiVhSF3iHIYMnAKdC7O 2X+Q==
X-Received: by 10.180.80.9 with SMTP id n9mr2678852wix.87.1437708578878; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:1028:838c:7092:285c:e4d7:d649:85e4? (dynamic-2a00-1028-838c-7092-285c-e4d7-d649-85e4.ipv6.broadband.iol.cz. [2a00:1028:838c:7092:285c:e4d7:d649:85e4]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id dl10sm10362032wjb.42.2015.07.23.20.29.37 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: the names that aren't DNS names problem, was Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
References: <20150720192219.53802.qmail@ary.lan> <55ADF2A7.3080403@cisco.com> <A0418F96-1D79-4BE9-A72A-7A47641E4AF3@gmail.com> <CAKr6gn1apWx2M7V-O6ea2kvor7Di6=jYMh-uY2ouTsgjkV6vLw@mail.gmail.com> <20150722084204.GA15378@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <CAKr6gn2413-2XW8d_stw0dTmP-KsmGgFgQ3tVXEgXrXmnCiQow@mail.gmail.com> <6E97605B-C11E-4349-90FC-109E4983112C@istaff.org> <45F6578D-BA19-4333-8935-C954BBD9AEE8@nominum.com> <F8B1240553F1ED877E42F66D@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <55B1B122.4040901@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 05:29:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F8B1240553F1ED877E42F66D@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FngJiiPuMQLYXmTaKsaAq5TUrdk>
Cc: ietf <IETF@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:29:41 -0000

On 7/24/2015 12:15 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>  So someone makes one of those
> applications, moves a name through the ICANN process, and then
> ICANN comes to the IETF and says "is it ok to approve and
> delegate that name".   I hesitate to think about what would
> happen if we said "no", but assume it would involve
> organizations trying to get their $300-$400K (each) back and
> lawyers.


On the other hand, that model nicely matches how we do standards
approval, in terms of requiring extended, up-front investment, with no
basis for determining likely approval...

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email