IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]

Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com> Sun, 14 September 2014 07:39 UTC

Return-Path: <weihaw@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F61A1A029D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.03
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.03 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JjjWjQwFN_uU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x230.google.com (mail-qg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9B121A028E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id q108so2622568qgd.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=TM7j3PofoTaDTwvHD+YgAYwFsaO5qjw/E+wniyAM9/E=; b=HGAXen9CEp3oOLix9L5KGvKW1E++p0EQgWhKFSJaf8/vCnX6xMz7/nTawC08uEpopM q4ZUCVmRqctHsl0c+blXqKguY8xa6qCBq1fMUKoMqY6Wgxjp8TnOp3y+IRMJtNRgWYD0 a6ynayTZavkd8MKij7025EC1bMSb8Ox2FdlkXcmQPrYyFbRnaqK7cMnBxgRcBuJAHXfD vdKf6eEoZK0gAFJZNV7x6ApOEJy13oQv9dIDGoXVnCr8JCm1kEvfKztZIhYhwhNycxXa wrPEwzX8PtGbDUNdwjAr/IznK05lzphVqZvrDqMgfxIjZTkOar2D+sEu1mFhx7HU4Yfi Qw7Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=TM7j3PofoTaDTwvHD+YgAYwFsaO5qjw/E+wniyAM9/E=; b=bYlLuEN55FjguajyrjWAHsYc5PGYnNSs/j497YEIpLNqBxmD4cEljWTRi1MBL1fQFk JP1JBtCo5pcw+9VmVfXXCininri7TtxnG+9qUt4L8wrzqMwfFtz8oRn6kcH6eS2KPL7i UomyLas8NNTxybR7SfIggh/TL1BPdk8gyFhk3oWZ/6bvCxQD6bhUbB6+dbB6uuWoApIP bq5hUSYRhcpdX2qBLoEORptqSD7Epl3dSTTj3SvvL++A87msVeRn3AXOsnRDHtkdZNOw obckZCfp5FE0z+9acXbY1unAuz1MYCsBht8usEAvCoxwV6aEXoidEg1Dgy/2x5mnUZCi oKFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmedrTh7sJGckiHa2GnIU+fQcQj2FByFgBNqJgXPGRCO+3P148mdA36kfuWqerPILhSTOy0
X-Received: by 10.140.23.177 with SMTP id 46mr18089103qgp.64.1410680349015; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.116.71 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140913134907.2020.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0525E806C5@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <20140913134907.2020.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: Wei Chuang <weihaw@google.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 00:38:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAFsWK0JxsruvXLhv_pyYF+VWafNKqnqik-32QJNJDXoeCfo+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c130c21883400503019db5"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3bvIz0swMkU4TyvFiqQyvharCa0
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 07:39:11 -0000

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 6:49 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> >Agreed, but just wanted to add one thing- doesn't the details of the
> whether the sender
> >has to align or not depends on whether SPF or DKIM is used as the
> authentication method?
>
> No.  Neither DKIM nor SPF have any connection to either the From: or
> Sender: header other than what DMARC is trying to do.
>

Not terribly important but- my statement about DKIM/SPF was in the context
of DMARC.


> R's,
> John
>
>
-Wei

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email