Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Wed, 10 September 2014 16:04 UTC
Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679061A8757 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.654
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.654 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FLLol_iyOQnL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [IPv6:2607:f2f8:ab14::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B7BC1A8775 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bcn-dbarton.lan (unknown [67.159.169.102]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 829B422B46 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:04:08 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dkim; t=1410365048; bh=/6itPkKhe08Hh0BRr1267DT2fQj8j+wPfHTNTaI+nws=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ZHPTg2KO3qfOssmFhI44gyLeV5AzD//c/LZ/nza58FcTzPdp/f8CfLJ1ePFrBPgAI G9JVZPq3Kwg0uLYmB7JYFN75wJkv6wM/uKYcYhSbC0ixElGWHAPSjzLQWwn40X1ymG PB2Zd3ZV1BErJ0KQLlWCu8FlN9uZC+V9ECzXADWk=
Message-ID: <54107679.8080006@dougbarton.us>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:04:09 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
References: <54000A31.5050907@gmail.com> <20140829121101.GA16477@gsp.org> <EE9969EE-D338-4A0B-8C5B-425B638E743B@live555.com> <CABmDk8nPa3cEy_MbkTRpuP65fvQdE5PWux3Dhy5MsUS1_sZrrg@mail.gmail.com> <5400DE33.3020401@gmail.com> <CAA=duU2Jr5GNT47o6MAD+nh98BxR0qx1fnoCAho=+Jep2HU=9g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU2Jr5GNT47o6MAD+nh98BxR0qx1fnoCAho=+Jep2HU=9g@mail.gmail.com>
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/K5Sp3bawFH_3KClPCt2K5QDI8nA
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:04:11 -0000
On 8/29/14 2:48 PM, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > From what I've read elsewhere, Mailman 2.1.18 mitigates the DMARC > problem. The IETF is currently using 2.1.15, so once the powers-that-be > upgrade us to 2.1.18, the problem may be solved. Is there an update on this? Aside from the operational importance of having the IETF mailing lists working well for all users, knowledge of how well the latest mailman fixes work will be very helpful for this community to have. ... and FWIW, I enabled a "report only" DMARC record for my personal domains, including the one for the addresses that I regularly use to post to mailing lists. I have seen a lot of reports coming back, not just from the big players, but also from a lot of others. So this issue is only growing in importance. Doug
- gmail users read on... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: gmail users read on... Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Michael Richardson
- Re: gmail users read on... Mary Barnes
- RE: gmail users read on... l.wood
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... Tim Bray
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: gmail users read on... Paul Hoffman
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... joel jaeggli
- Re: gmail users read on... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: gmail users read on... [technical subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Hector Santos
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Antonio Prado
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Joe Abley
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Christian Huitema
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Miles Fidelman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Donald Eastlake
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Viktor Dukhovni
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: gmail users read on... Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Scott Kitterman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: gmail users read on... George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… David Morris
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec