Re: gmail users read on...
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Fri, 29 August 2014 15:37 UTC
Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5FE1A058E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4i8QsF9kXm64 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6033B1A0545 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ij19so2658821vcb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=65BB01BYEE1vOTmN7QllT5q9PEPZxjndUF/XzWB5SE8=; b=OYa0YWGGTTKVQJj1TK3ayf9va+XULD0IMDOAzLN9SjUfvA0YvpHepa5Yv04KvVVIQQ gyQm3uPxlALxQlIDh0UaiWz76H5tKynHU1QFZf820AJCMKD2fosEP4iJ+ECIpv2wBpUy jJgk939CgZlXnSOTsRpbbH8dt/4OhYzwpb6sYthzze/cYJvBdacVL8Ng5Nf3SwFh1VJL jvHEA8bFK9aLB9zDWBrdrB1CaGdAqwEWYA4ZocfjK5oI8xwCvv/NLYXXnzLWY/sVXqBb t2YUgWBtnii1gkQO9oatum2KZkzlRhqo12kRErfhvVn3pUChishqRyHsFsn5uEpJC3z0 78Nw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkthISsrUEPg90Q03OoDN68Q3TsPQa+nlz4Y/PxNBkX7OrROD6cmKjvafwxcKFoexUWVdvY
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.46.5 with SMTP id h5mr1756287vcf.55.1409326623465; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.214.4 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [24.84.235.32]
Received: by 10.220.214.4 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <EE9969EE-D338-4A0B-8C5B-425B638E743B@live555.com>
References: <54000A31.5050907@gmail.com> <20140829121101.GA16477@gsp.org> <EE9969EE-D338-4A0B-8C5B-425B638E743B@live555.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:37:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHBU6ivjr9F4TOGkO9iDdaZNGmycZ1h2RnRPTGpSiRR3aPwWNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gmail users read on...
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: Ross Finlayson <finlayson@live555.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2d2bec3c0c60501c66cc1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/p77oJjzuk2qxqdDVbqHHNoO7Mss
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:37:15 -0000
Us bozos who've been relying on Gmail for years are humbled and honored to be in the presence of real professionals like you. BTW, the presence of "@ gmail.com" is not a reliable criterion for detecting Gmail use and implicit bozo-ness. You may have been paying serious attention all these years to some of the wrong people; how tragic. On Aug 29, 2014 7:48 AM, "Ross Finlayson" <finlayson@live555.com> wrote: > > > Gmail, like Yahoo and Hotmail and AOL, is sporadically useful for casual > > purposes where mail transmission and receipt isn't terribly important. > > But it's much too poorly operated to be acceptable for professional use. > > Plus the fact that "@yahoo.com" and "@gmail.com" (etc.) serve as good > first-level 'Bozo Filters'. DMARC serves as yet another reminder that > serious professionals should not be using such email addresses. > > Ross. > >
- gmail users read on... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: gmail users read on... Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Michael Richardson
- Re: gmail users read on... Mary Barnes
- RE: gmail users read on... l.wood
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... Tim Bray
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: gmail users read on... Paul Hoffman
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... joel jaeggli
- Re: gmail users read on... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: gmail users read on... [technical subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Hector Santos
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Antonio Prado
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Joe Abley
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Christian Huitema
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Miles Fidelman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Donald Eastlake
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Viktor Dukhovni
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: gmail users read on... Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Scott Kitterman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: gmail users read on... George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… David Morris
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec