Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 29 August 2014 20:10 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8331D1A070F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hs6tSlzBSBbe for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com (mail-pa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B4EA1A068D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id kq14so7163007pab.22 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wufWNcKREZLLmBBoWzdxlwO2mL39E4c9KXQInR/JLS8=; b=xV/0ZM83KMwmIyJr/2eIX0y2uOjpbbRodzWBhsCm6d1+OiqdLlJQrp31sSJugCgiKU KTvpNlF1eLhrWezKM6/2q6e1+oTO+zjUoXg9wsA9L4T3+/X+jiLJgGFq6Su0ExkmBHNG Z1TQBwth2aLZJc1vmvjb+q14B4/oC9aYPpGoIrwDsscU5NltSHOsq/UeLxBdrs9WL0Mw tFiyUILgVIDcx+zGtvW6Tyw1naZjSt7UJa3/djOtd0w+rTUJATvf2ZdeL6j+WTWcmIQJ 6ruNoItKCKqbK986XY5gc4PZIl3QigGTbqConVgtjzE5UOtxRCHm7bo95/wJ1QbVGyK+ aH+A==
X-Received: by 10.70.100.227 with SMTP id fb3mr18316077pdb.137.1409343019213; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (103.198.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.198.103]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qg6sm1229748pdb.5.2014.08.29.13.10.17 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5400DE33.3020401@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:10:27 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
References: <54000A31.5050907@gmail.com> <20140829121101.GA16477@gsp.org> <EE9969EE-D338-4A0B-8C5B-425B638E743B@live555.com> <CABmDk8nPa3cEy_MbkTRpuP65fvQdE5PWux3Dhy5MsUS1_sZrrg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABmDk8nPa3cEy_MbkTRpuP65fvQdE5PWux3Dhy5MsUS1_sZrrg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cKjDly4DrQSG3k6Eig5RRbEV2wo
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:10:20 -0000
On 30/08/2014 03:00, Mary Barnes wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Ross Finlayson <finlayson@live555.com> > wrote: > >>> Gmail, like Yahoo and Hotmail and AOL, is sporadically useful for casual >>> purposes where mail transmission and receipt isn't terribly important. >>> But it's much too poorly operated to be acceptable for professional use. >> Plus the fact that "@yahoo.com" and "@gmail.com" (etc.) serve as good >> first-level 'Bozo Filters'. DMARC serves as yet another reminder that >> serious professionals should not be using such email addresses. >> > [MB] I guess I am a terribly unserious professional. You might consider > that some of us switched to gmail because corporate filters are often > TERRIBLE about periodically blocking email from IETF mailing lists. And, > trying to convince some of those 'Bozos' not to do so is a exercise in > futility. If you're lucky, they'll provide you with a daily list of some > of the messages they've quarantined and you can then go and retrieve those. > So, I've had a much better experience since I switched from using > corporate email for professional use to gmail for 'unserious' professional > use. > [/MB] Exactly. Since I switched to gmail for IETF traffic, I have changed employers, retired, un-retired and moved countries three times, with a stable email environment and no need to fight any corporate or ISP policies. The threat of DMARC hassle is the first real problem I've had. Brian
- gmail users read on... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: gmail users read on... Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Michael Richardson
- Re: gmail users read on... Mary Barnes
- RE: gmail users read on... l.wood
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... Tim Bray
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: gmail users read on... Paul Hoffman
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... joel jaeggli
- Re: gmail users read on... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: gmail users read on... [technical subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Hector Santos
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Antonio Prado
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Joe Abley
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Christian Huitema
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Miles Fidelman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Donald Eastlake
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Viktor Dukhovni
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: gmail users read on... Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Scott Kitterman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: gmail users read on... George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… David Morris
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec