Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
Antonio Prado <thinkofit@gmail.com> Fri, 05 September 2014 15:47 UTC
Return-Path: <thinkofit@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27ACF1A0739 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9gz_McQ8WA42 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 976F81A02FC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 08:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id b17so13990219lan.22 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yeHfKXXJD+2fzOf/za4iMQU5zBXXMuLbMOb5wRhSUYc=; b=PKwNJWcYMLwsiozaNCvDTWKG4SGshvVhHgRNmIjz1F+E90zMXUKkVw9jLqyn93eClL MCCkPkJVkuSnXnLLo9Wm683tf2/unpbMFdp8x5VfOoDC8WKrQgBpeFWra7hWoPllqkWM G+HT37AT3GWzyp6Pp5PNx2G3pS0kNmyddZn3FG/h0qtg/NkDRYoomwEct2zJCq64N9qO 0lJSIw66xounECsJ9AFBbqNJ90oJj2LYcHeCRsOUKt7KL4wpJJaV11pR7lsGXNNAHFEe WiwWdecUdmo03KTb1Ma3URsORFEhsTHtzwbplluVjqLMzdgDY14kv9cotbjS4GSZq1ie c5Ig==
X-Received: by 10.152.121.8 with SMTP id lg8mr3922943lab.98.1409932064944; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PRDMBP.local ([2a02:cdc5:9715:150:342f:bfe0:a5a9:730c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h9sm805453lae.40.2014.09.05.08.47.43 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 08:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5409DB1E.6080205@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:47:42 +0200
From: Antonio Prado <thinkofit@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
References: <54000A31.5050907@gmail.com> <20140829121101.GA16477@gsp.org> <EE9969EE-D338-4A0B-8C5B-425B638E743B@live555.com> <CABmDk8nPa3cEy_MbkTRpuP65fvQdE5PWux3Dhy5MsUS1_sZrrg@mail.gmail.com> <5400DE33.3020401@gmail.com> <1C383F27-8BBF-4FAF-9772-346C2232A332@isdg.net>
In-Reply-To: <1C383F27-8BBF-4FAF-9772-346C2232A332@isdg.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/sCtVjk578jgo5g2U1Hnlb1RMaLo
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 15:47:48 -0000
On 9/5/14 5:39 PM, Hector Santos wrote: > One solution to all this is for the IETF to offer their own firstname.lastname@member.ietf.org "registration" account to participants. that's not a solution, it's a bug :) -- antonio
- gmail users read on... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: gmail users read on... Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Michael Richardson
- Re: gmail users read on... Mary Barnes
- RE: gmail users read on... l.wood
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... Tim Bray
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: gmail users read on... Paul Hoffman
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... joel jaeggli
- Re: gmail users read on... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: gmail users read on... [technical subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Hector Santos
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Antonio Prado
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Joe Abley
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Christian Huitema
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Miles Fidelman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Donald Eastlake
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Viktor Dukhovni
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: gmail users read on... Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Scott Kitterman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: gmail users read on... George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… David Morris
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec