IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 13 September 2014 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FEB1A0797 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 06:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.263
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.263 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mYAzTGNQtE4c for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 06:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 939391A02C1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 06:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30718 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2014 13:49:28 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 13 Sep 2014 13:49:28 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=7e5.54144b6a.k1409; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=EKCNSv88QkgCSsS3lxM+kEWp+scfGc7PwDxs0mw8eWA=; b=hQIPIQlKWO4+K0y+xBwESaELibL/bQFktB0GVpf86Gd4cHBSsJ00XXDmwTX2BEPdgfiULGFH//eITTfjmA22ChwNrqE/7/LhbSbqJn2pxwclzCbA9sGvxksBgsXc/CntXZa1C54hXzvC1VU1FQM/v21/LBbrzqUKb+B/rGQuP2f+47LUJwJRKPtuy4HxBWRXM4+SXAs75/BFp1xTZPKWJ9pOaGWYLDgKz8RWrDXGkRUJTRTe9gXYStKxZ+eotFb/
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=7e5.54144b6a.k1409; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=EKCNSv88QkgCSsS3lxM+kEWp+scfGc7PwDxs0mw8eWA=; b=aKjcWpuHjqvxW4y45AWbHHb/sz0fOy2Jdmvw7FFfVbWsvI8cO696DUpWLDGDgxt9XOQiq5KWLoHl37/QmUIDZzIqUdAnrsa01hq9Eo6bkFewfztD0wZkto+20UppJrdbVv/AO3tttKygEptHkp258ZBMfUnxgTvM2Tgd0eFt9qMkbDhfELmXwr/0nhpUfny80970UcToLZlkYnIPnEGgjFnpvzeRGJqOdrQypiTMcW9J4tmcgNqsa2Nxhl8O0/AU
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:49:07 -0000
Message-ID: <20140913134907.2020.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
In-Reply-To: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0525E806C5@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wEI8ibJZoaYwEnJBZJ0fyrwKEXY
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:49:30 -0000

>Agreed, but just wanted to add one thing- doesn't the details of the whether the sender
>has to align or not depends on whether SPF or DKIM is used as the authentication method? 

No.  Neither DKIM nor SPF have any connection to either the From: or
Sender: header other than what DMARC is trying to do.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email