Re: gmail users read on...

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 29 August 2014 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA24C1A063C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DcbA2f6c-QtY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE2F1A0652 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-0-66-181.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s7TG5gmi016639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:05:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-0-66-181.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.181] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: gmail users read on...
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <F19E2478-03FC-4B82-BB01-C61037F1C49A@live555.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 09:05:41 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DB87078B-095B-496F-8383-382F0A9A3898@vpnc.org>
References: <1409325604012.98047@surrey.ac.uk> <54009DC8.7030300@isi.edu> <F19E2478-03FC-4B82-BB01-C61037F1C49A@live555.com>
To: Ross Finlayson <finlayson@live555.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Paz6LV3myUnJaQRso7UyILsu0PU
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:05:47 -0000

On Aug 29, 2014, at 8:54 AM, Ross Finlayson <finlayson@live555.com> wrote:

> The fact that such services are useful is undeniable.  As is the fact that "@yahoo.com" and "@gmail.com" email address look unprofessional.  They just do.

More unprofessional than making blanket statements for the whole world based on your personal opinions?

--Paul Hoffman