Re: gmail users read on... [technical subtopic]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 29 August 2014 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A5D1A06A2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_110=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SoMBDQj88R8i for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22f.google.com (mail-pd0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B55F51A068D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id ft15so1138023pdb.34 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HVwMB5QUyYGXa1pMjTLD40L0LkEJOnAFPUFDjbAL1to=; b=YwZQlxWcRTNQt93ZDRjIHFq/RhW1RWZOa8KP6xgiNtgp/dK93Pd+KA41k7IxtailiE Is90ZHH3pmFdrxcrSs816FUbYMKOPKJLOD+QOysnqU6I+GZIFOiDkBl4K4YM0rsdqaaP 7YmvsEGtFdmBifqC857ZdUFefIm4sRSqdQgeaVBHjP2EDGP4aCIfW+X9SeKlnj8UILmY hFA7jqWCZeGJc5PKaiqr3R/L6+hbulQmzDxSnGF/Qbg2oufjD0jU58h+w4/4hPC8jUa7 A/rH5EE+zFDTZnYrkoX1ONMzmIZiFcjukNcGOyztQ6OkUaNDuSfeM5XpJZnCMEniZvUY EJHQ==
X-Received: by 10.69.31.234 with SMTP id kp10mr18755886pbd.138.1409342678338; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.23] (103.198.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.198.103]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fl3sm2929160pad.8.2014.08.29.13.04.36 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5400DCDE.5010506@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:04:46 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: Re: gmail users read on... [technical subtopic]
References: <54000A31.5050907@gmail.com> <21715.1409324036@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <21715.1409324036@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zumv2X4UEQy79GZk_PqA39CE8Qw
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:04:39 -0000

On 30/08/2014 02:53, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > I hate to bring this topic up again but people should perhaps be aware
>     > that some legitimate IETF mail is now being automatically spam filtered
>     > for gmail recipients. Here is an anonymized version of what I just wrote
>     > to someone.
> 
>     > Be aware that as a result of corporate IT decisions at your company and
>     > at Google, your mail to IETF lists is being forcibly tagged as spam for
>     > gmail recipients.
> 
>     > 1) Example is announcing DMARC p=reject policy:
> 
>     > _dmarc.example.com   text =
> 
>     > "v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject"
> 
>     > 2) gmail asserts a DMARC failure when your mail has been forwarded
>     > by an IETF list such as XYZ:
> 
> So, it classifies as spam, but it doesn't reject?

Correct. gmail appears to treat p=reject as p=quarantine,
so the unintended side effect is only a false positive, not
a bounce.

> So the gmail user isn't being kicked off the list, at this point?

That issue would affect the user at example.com (whose domain specifies p=reject)

   Brian