Re: gmail users read on...

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Mon, 15 September 2014 01:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF291A0489 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fiPvCjdyHtkH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com (mail-pa0-f49.google.com [209.85.220.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C329E1A0487 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id lf10so5304518pab.36 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qFFeSPw7iN5mpYC00wsIYitGz1j3wk65akl3iEZd4pY=; b=Su8UwqK2FcmHIssnfzSAJc7aUTSuFfph21Mr52zsPj2k7IU/JmZYDmwKu4xI8mAsSl i9q8pVWSJFYa43Q6fSqBddTmEgVWswb1so/wXj6LNglRHS6KH2NXZhSL3txUxUzYZXkF XG+Xos91xyT3/Ih44ms59WSuZLWuVUZlZYtfMl1se5JfyEbUG7v5/xt9GWxH1D4wUwuD 5frj5+iExOlup5FKqd8JtPOYHV3UFrHtQJhMV4ho3hFM7/qIzuLOze4qKWcmgZisSAnx pl1A7s0O9/E7Amo7aTW3rwq+b7K/8+U7PomBIyzsKdDzi5EKH4ouLdKXnuPXExe9I9ed QLMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkdHYEhz/fwFvFq/Xcu2Gr1rjU1de/e3Yj+k5arLUeKzjaKeQZJfJqhJReXSXeXmojMzMm8
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.69.18.75 with SMTP id gk11mr29496037pbd.92.1410745672457; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.95.135 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:dd8:c::531]
In-Reply-To: <E1E602D6-24D1-49EA-AD32-235E25497607@isdg.net>
References: <1409325604012.98047@surrey.ac.uk> <30F00A7A-9800-4F44-B75B-A6196604D27C@live555.com> <E1E602D6-24D1-49EA-AD32-235E25497607@isdg.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:47:52 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn268dBm049DMoBKBsv2=PJeZo3_GPN5rsC4W9n5PEo0Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gmail users read on...
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
To: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11363228acf9f8050310d2b9"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uISbtbYzqqkbQH1b5Lw9CaeL-4o
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 01:47:54 -0000

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> wrote:

> The whole point of using theses alias or junk domains was to help protect
> your real professional domains and also get around some restrictions or
> slow down using your professional domain.
>
> However, overtime, these junk domains have become more embedded in
> people's lives. They are using them more across more services.  It has
> become a "second life" for many.
>
>
I have taken the overwhelming majority of *NOG and IETF WG list subscribes
out of my corporate identity into the cloud, for two reasons.

Firstly, the web tools have become significantly better to the point they
are actually significantly better than the MUA on my laptop for free-text
search, spamtag, sorting and keyboard accellerators.

Secondly, no matter how many times you say "my work does not own my
opinions" it remains a risk of taint both ways. I know my work INFORMS my
opinions. By using the throwaway generic mails I can establish to my own
satisfaction I said it, not my work role.

Where it gets complex is when you want to have your corporate, potentially
NDA covered work mail in the cloud. I'm not satisfied that the google
response (as an example) demands you accept US law and physical storage. If
they offered a guarantee its clouds lie inside my own polity, that works
better for me. I realise that there are significant players in other
economies who are delighted their content is not under the  hands of their
own law enforcement, but I have other issues.

G