Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 12 September 2014 22:18 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681821A004C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tuBHpmPM2nY0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB7411A008B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id gi9so1775060lab.38 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OXF31osQdVu8wnWuEEU36dSJ15La7/W/L/b3+EUQCrE=; b=TltrFFYpDKBqCMIDZ/9z1ASgnfE7yMyS6DDRd9Zoo5XrCPtCJGbEWmPdJvPLj75z2o W/giojBhQjO4ZN+eHiS0KSHsSg/lVuaBHgEN77eMFSWe6Jl8DNL6R+gIBx2D/quMYM8y /4HVl5lxSO2q9wUKmBJvFR8LDgN5vrqRAw7dcxnI+lRzT9rU2/9ZSKMeExE4BQX9ZXc4 ONSD2Ecs636DD1XcLbFI+jhN/KbF4EmhYERBkQESdAAlzOjaR47TG1rErbhjuOnPews0 I0bM697RxoQ85IsjewF8c7HYeCWPC0JtdQdMW5qA7PMvTBTWC3TuKSifc+FWm3VnU8gX XM/A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.1.6 with SMTP id 6mr12161172lai.22.1410560282126; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.211.82 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5411DC37.8080101@dougbarton.us>
References: <20140911012524.4078.qmail@joyce.lan> <5BDC34CDABC75F8588294487@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5411DC37.8080101@dougbarton.us>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:18:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa-VhCqsu4yuG4Sg83DQ7oD_6GMA0TDkh_iM4ta6_uYeg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013c67068cecc70502e5a829"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Jv2jhnWSXLObeHoSy3JESFIwC9I
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 22:18:05 -0000

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> wrote:

> I proposed creating a draft for a standardized way of encoding the
> original from address to the left of the @ sign so that the mailing list
> sender could create a valid DKIM record, but clients could be taught to
> decode the original From:.  You and others pooh-pooh'ed that suggestion,
> but I haven't seen a better one yet.
>

Isn't that SRS?

-MSK