IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 11 September 2014 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9421A019A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.463
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, MANGLED_SPAM=2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KutWE5Bvtzm4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C0B21A01F2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 64802 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2014 20:21:21 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 11 Sep 2014 20:21:21 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=d00.54120440.k1409; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=nVi1sYHiGsfN+cCBzAGtBjHMwJlsENGQbEO5BnP7DWM=; b=hxksHYjLQIXMShfYn4OrmP/HH7BbCMVbyoVpLZ3C9Ala+R1841xXj79F3ziBP7LQOYBKE9PNhrk/9Fti0+i5C8IG/QXLAyLaytW0m51RhXe3qQWxrsZtiRUHAiSLHDjk7ZX/wHaLeypxb4sWgzy0e3/RvPcK0ujK1n0R8wcabUVAjpsa4hvC3pPQxvdXkdRak+YDqIqJoon0j7CoM+KvaviRv6xcSfcGutjs4VxoOdxEi/oX7iWGsRugzGXusotW
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=d00.54120440.k1409; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=nVi1sYHiGsfN+cCBzAGtBjHMwJlsENGQbEO5BnP7DWM=; b=OmcFv/ygNPi1VIVXpJ9s+o8nrYabCLTCTvnKEpNuVCTWZmf/6Dxsbs900gWEsOmY80P06wlbF2McBwyJuwCRPY8qs0rHx3Owok/j/FQSa82hrRaQx0++8bsOCF/Cvefw9MxIQia6KqybpJvmWS82nvmlghZiF2aulQGSllPB37H/M3Ac+RULD/iGHl/hhJsxwd2+ZMI6sOAxXb/r6erJJlAR0qwny9YK5vKzfHnbV6G1WdO8NwDj+wIIPodGzNhl
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:20:58 -0000
Message-ID: <20140911202058.3327.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
In-Reply-To: <5411DC37.8080101@dougbarton.us>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zTyhC7zcc3AyPSw2BWUjMkRAvF0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:21:42 -0000

>Perhaps you could share what you're doing with the secretariat? I agree 
>with John Klensin that it would be awesome for the IETF to become 
>thought leaders in creating a solution for mailing lists in the p=reject 
>era.

Um, as I said two messages ago:

>> I've collected all of the DMARC workarounds I know on the ASRG wiki:
>> http://wiki.asrg.sp.am/wiki/Mitigating_DMARC_damage_to_third_party_mail

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email