Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Fri, 05 September 2014 18:37 UTC
Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE9A1A01E0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gwsfWiD-y_G3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9ACA1A01FF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id rd18so14713096iec.27 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=OywwwdYL/tSYyO+iOQqTdbo63+D+Vmtdd9267sGwREI=; b=eWWMRYa3ABwA+RmIehCDC38KDLTjBNuFiODs3Uy6qGXECgkVnFn1mgTHrOcMMw0FGs D/27tirDkBdPm3x/B5R5+WW6oGxFMXfgKl+DDB6ibL4ES6pCRKvEJd2f3We2nkSN3be/ EBl0455Th5Ki7myhhw4Hg8G6/NNepODq86Bj8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=OywwwdYL/tSYyO+iOQqTdbo63+D+Vmtdd9267sGwREI=; b=SDOWOu2IMWdoWFlz7yR/1QH8qNpUWrGuUpfdBzOjbQ783BMRdi1RZcdPx/D2vv27x7 4+f+vEcP62Y/LudqYwxTw9BIU2LSQ258+bzRJfB432fRzaPTR+KMQesDevBxq+Biyqid GQc/Htxh0aJM6xTKmGOPrE3nPQWZBqUpksxcncLiOyzSWt81RXx9/q4Ih2crHoqI0Vma C8ZF4JB4hZZ84ewfBk20G7mQn3V247mNgRQjIzHWuBBTfviLoIme8KkMXD3XMQH9IW64 QwAipcA8nJEvjN7AB37fqvZWU6INrdKyWSbPi4lQMOLpUEaG8yzN9n6oykSAb1K8q7X2 oMxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlsEWZ7xIes9ja9SOgja16LLst9cezqbFxVL3Yk/JNvmJwvysShPfKwbufiFiozjoWHjyVk
X-Received: by 10.50.79.132 with SMTP id j4mr7498993igx.9.1409942259060; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:b399:3001:34b2:924e:54ed:ac1f? ([2001:470:b399:3001:34b2:924e:54ed:ac1f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hg4sm2140482igb.15.2014.09.05.11.37.38 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic]
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <1C383F27-8BBF-4FAF-9772-346C2232A332@isdg.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 14:37:36 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <84497AEA-0729-4814-BB6F-C643D960D1F3@hopcount.ca>
References: <54000A31.5050907@gmail.com> <20140829121101.GA16477@gsp.org> <EE9969EE-D338-4A0B-8C5B-425B638E743B@live555.com> <CABmDk8nPa3cEy_MbkTRpuP65fvQdE5PWux3Dhy5MsUS1_sZrrg@mail.gmail.com> <5400DE33.3020401@gmail.com> <1C383F27-8BBF-4FAF-9772-346C2232A332@isdg.net>
To: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bTE48Im1oTLh7B1uCq_b_1U52jI
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:37:44 -0000
On 5 Sep 2014, at 11:39, Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> wrote: > One solution to all this is for the IETF to offer their own firstname.lastname@member.ietf.org "registration" account to participants. I use gmail. I don't send e-mail from an address ending in a google-managed domain, though. I am in control of what policy I publish in the DNS for my own domains. The distinction is important. Joe
- gmail users read on... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: gmail users read on... Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Michael Richardson
- Re: gmail users read on... Mary Barnes
- RE: gmail users read on... l.wood
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... Tim Bray
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: gmail users read on... Paul Hoffman
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... joel jaeggli
- Re: gmail users read on... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: gmail users read on... [technical subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Hector Santos
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Antonio Prado
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Joe Abley
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Christian Huitema
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Miles Fidelman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Donald Eastlake
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Viktor Dukhovni
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: gmail users read on... Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Scott Kitterman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: gmail users read on... George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… David Morris
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec