Re: gmail users read on...
"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Fri, 29 August 2014 11:49 UTC
Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3431A012D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 04:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4AQTAjCN1paN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 04:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 089611A0102 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 04:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id x3so2207598qcv.16 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 04:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=uhIdyv/i8Ipt5ZjZS3ycihE79VCbPXElGnr5jrLahWA=; b=OeDyQ94z4tH7hm2nRRjzJ/tQLLrAAoBN/+aXq/6ifLWye7pS00ngRczV8VJH+Kq/1M O3zJJqR660CsTXfWedPqLkZV343GpxJ1/75r/Abjam7KSBBlLb5DVgY4j3cM6AfMb1Xe bCitPKYDKdlfEAsaQeVmt4fsCw4LzkUiMQBu+/8IunT2YImjwId4aHWz6NLTE/6tj8Vu nKS2s88MqLQh87FzV9She6fcqtYLRiplRgq6EzewqrF/UFC7gwsMuwX6/ayKFxBjsdQk 2gf6q7HrwNkNGHTflXVLYEdCGCOehINP/oqJ9q8TJrS63fxLHA3q2cihFkshtVyVPW+o 7d2w==
X-Received: by 10.140.44.67 with SMTP id f61mr15865137qga.44.1409312979205; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 04:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.91.99 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 04:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <54000A31.5050907@gmail.com>
References: <54000A31.5050907@gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:49:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2VK58b4kjoQ=fasOYwkcp-Z17GAEToJ9u8uTSxG-CYWg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gmail users read on...
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113943d880c7440501c33fbc"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/anmr23bznU6Y35FPT7uKGa_acdk
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 11:49:41 -0000
Brian, I have been seeing this somewhat, especially from people sending from Yahoo email to IETF lists. Thanks for the reminder. Cheers, Andy On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > I hate to bring this topic up again but people should perhaps be aware > that some legitimate IETF mail is now being automatically spam filtered > for gmail recipients. Here is an anonymized version of what I just wrote > to someone. > > Be aware that as a result of corporate IT decisions at your company and > at Google, your mail to IETF lists is being forcibly tagged as spam for > gmail recipients. > > 1) Example is announcing DMARC p=reject policy: > > _dmarc.example.com text = > > "v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject" > > 2) gmail asserts a DMARC failure when your mail has been forwarded > by an IETF list such as XYZ: > > Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; > spf=pass (google.com: domain of XYZ-bounces@ietf.org designates > 2001:xxxxxxxxx as permitted sender) > smtp.mail=XYZ-bounces@ietf.org; > dkim=pass header.i=@ietf.org; > dmarc=fail (p=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=example.com > > 3) then gmail forcibly classes your message as spam. > > Since many IETF participants use gmail, many people (myself included) > will not be seeing your mail unless they happen to check their spam > folder. > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > >
- gmail users read on... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... Rich Kulawiec
- Re: gmail users read on... Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Michael Richardson
- Re: gmail users read on... Mary Barnes
- RE: gmail users read on... l.wood
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... Tim Bray
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ross Finlayson
- Re: gmail users read on... Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: gmail users read on... Paul Hoffman
- Re: gmail users read on... TJ
- Re: gmail users read on... Ted Faber
- Re: gmail users read on... joel jaeggli
- Re: gmail users read on... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: gmail users read on... [technical subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Andrew G. Malis
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Hector Santos
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Antonio Prado
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Joe Abley
- Re: gmail users read on... [bozo subtopic] Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Christian Huitema
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Miles Fidelman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Donald Eastlake
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Viktor Dukhovni
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- RE: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Doug Barton
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Nico Williams
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John C Klensin
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Wei Chuang
- Re: gmail users read on... Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Scott Kitterman
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Hector Santos
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Dave Crocker
- Re: gmail users read on... George Michaelson
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… David Morris
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… John Levine
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: dmarc damage, was gmail users read on... [boz… Rich Kulawiec