IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Regarding call Chinese names

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 11 July 2013 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A0F21F9983 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.386, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id boKKkr24P+UY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4BF21F9974 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id c10so17749743ieb.24 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4L9H6eamCNxHBTT6jYOE2KtekDbEAwRtPuXFVTE/cCM=; b=uEOVtEwZt+pitAr29F+Soj73iRB9i4AbYZHMxx+aLhNiCYOZaMb3heCeXEeDnL0Aie SkddwXGyuaclWipzDA9ebyel486ZbTif2xiNzxx2gMIVbf+SQYMcz+6pH94TNPjzOm5b 4zvNjhBBP4y03VLgNbfWuvt5o6HAU226b8gWqg8v83TuJ0Tcs0l21UNCrhzGPIPBrbmu l4JvBV5YmIoxsTPhvRnE6fK0wUo7E1/SNWJiwvmbsfmpmSQB3/muyPx8zdm0kgIKj/4G z5PF7kHzRg4XTkHDFhYi/mP+gkO96bubz+R4auOMnGmVARLLmhj7R+ScZnIP69MeG0l6 0+Ng==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.164.167 with SMTP id yr7mr8445890igb.22.1373562094768; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.29.202 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANF0JMBtNf9+=+CXo0xydfQ8AtQWaVYVKLBHmq8jBR-s2AuC7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANF0JMBtNf9+=+CXo0xydfQ8AtQWaVYVKLBHmq8jBR-s2AuC7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:01:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDZoX0Eq4TcbpP=+YMPmq-F3CAGB1dSogYJa6V2F-irbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regarding call Chinese names
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0122a7fcbc5c4204e13f584a"
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:01:36 -0000

Howdy,

Thanks for your efforts.  I would suggest, however, that you re-title your
drafts so that "Chinese" is restricted to the populations which use pinyin
and have standardized on what English speakers call Mandarin (國語
or 普通話, depending on your background).  Those who use  romanizations based
on other dialects, in line with their familial pronunciation, would
otherwise be treated as not "Chinese".

regards,

Ted Hardie


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all
>
> We submitted two drafts to help people here to correctly call chinese
> people names:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-call-chinese-names-00
>
>    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zcao-chinese-pronounce-00
>
>
>
> Feel free to let us know if you have any other issues?
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> -Hui Deng
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email