Re: Regarding call Chinese names

Joseph Yee <joseph.yee@gmail.com> Thu, 11 July 2013 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <joseph.yee@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8248021F99A9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dAOjjl7PRjvV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A6021F9AAB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 10so18817195ied.14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YUXKrqY4WFACBditBM5G96UViG4BjyeKwbuANDydDn4=; b=MF4bbuGiqK/LnRNrnNzhmxITXYXbLv5anUEdkg2SigdFxe9PgpSNRPOG70vZ6fVJSy 85jJJRIDqZj00/mBi3JwEGkF/OL+OMFxiagtyhBMiXa8ZIWrCHhvz2HoK3nlVFo1RUeW 105lIX5XrR7UKWbkSsJHdhe2OM7U7OGh0gNz6z0U7adhzHLNGleQiqaZUEgXhxmXFadH jLEvKnBgsFvNBPPnJI9+g4vEMl9goMnz4QiWeOTDr1fN0dPth9bkNjOdzZFy1ruW4KdB EuGe3bmOb6shDCqHF5MUo3IGO+kR+9RiZZDVBeXZN1Ckw5eRmsift1K0WXzIc4e5vfL1 z5xA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.43.14.74 with SMTP id pp10mr2939794icb.87.1373572198752; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.49.108 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEF_VnR2DNd_LDehXwJNn=0CT0Qkz3hKrBHuffVFvdXLMg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANF0JMBtNf9+=+CXo0xydfQ8AtQWaVYVKLBHmq8jBR-s2AuC7A@mail.gmail.com> <51DEB9F2.9040405@viagenie.ca> <F108A063F7E85E5F9C89ADBF@caldav.corp.apple.com> <CAF4+nEF_VnR2DNd_LDehXwJNn=0CT0Qkz3hKrBHuffVFvdXLMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:49:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CADRqEyqEmj9t6CmTnj95y9b6H=UfKpo6cJs4VZrtTdHdPur2SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regarding call Chinese names
From: Joseph Yee <joseph.yee@gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec519692ffae98104e141b2c3"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:50:00 -0000

+1

And should remove middle-name / middle-initial.  It's very bad.

Joseph


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:

> First/Last = bad/ambiguous
>
> Family (or maybe inherited) / Given = good
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> =============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> >
> > --On July 11, 2013 at 3:58:10 PM +0200 Simon Perreault
> > <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> >
> >>> We submitted two drafts to help people here to correctly call chinese
> >>> people names:
> >>>
> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-call-chinese-names-00
> >>>    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zcao-chinese-pronounce-00
> >>
> >>
> >> Very cool! Thanks for writing this!
> >>
> >> I have a question: I think I've seen Chinese names written in both
> >> orders. That is, sometimes "Hui Deng" will be written "Deng Hui". Am I
> >> right? Does this happen often? What is the most common order? Is there a
> >> way to guess what order a name is written in? Sometimes it's not easy
> >> for non-Sinophones to know which part is the given name and which part
> >> is the family name.
> >
> >
> > Well that actually brings up a good technical point!
> >
> > In iCalendar (RFC5545) we have properties to represent the organizer and
> > attendee of meetings. A parameter (attribute) of those properties is
> "CN" -
> > defined to be the "common name" of the corresponding calendar user.
> > Obviously that is a single string and typically the concatenation of
> first
> > name/last name. But that of course is a very "Western" approach.
> >
> > I have had several people request that iCalendar instead define new
> > parameters for "FIRST-NAME" and "LAST-NAME". That then gives clients the
> > option of re-ordering those for display purposes based on user locales
> and
> > preferences.
> >
> > So, from a technical standpoint, it seems better to always represent user
> > names using components (last, first, middle)? vCard does have an "N"
> > property where individual components of a name can be broken out.
> >
> > --
> > Cyrus Daboo
> >
>