IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Regarding call Chinese names

"Cao,Zhen" <zehn.cao@gmail.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5288111E826C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.375
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.375 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i8fE61Yuea7l for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6848011E8268 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b12so331265wgh.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/udJIeBUG61VJwQvpTXHv+1sdMO3bi98qzjCl1k783w=; b=PPXbZ3n74RBmze742Rgrp/N0mwakJkt7jP6hMedmykNuVrg3MJ1EzsvE8i3ZxAXrZk fEPRqbSDFt/TAIZeIUU20E5AZtsz9uawupzWgTiaYmQ66W95MdO6dulAN5d67h8CXMl8 5doQaDltr9Yip5IO6I+U49N1nQxP04ag6ogcqgL7uHZ//cHFboYnLycGt6E233yju1Ms ZVDt9wFZM6OKlmjkr0uu8Q5fZkiE5QbdmiEUU8FankNNzsUqsUqgeVTvMnzhr55T6vkV hSwPeFxE6cTvuU4mghcdeX77tCh8YRL61dI1YqaPVeplt3hklRUfIUA/YqE+4iXodGRN /0mg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.187.17 with SMTP id fo17mr244630wic.60.1373963715397; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.77.131 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCqRL5R8v5RivjRkNHQtMFiKs3Rhva+X5NogMB6_qMaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANF0JMBtNf9+=+CXo0xydfQ8AtQWaVYVKLBHmq8jBR-s2AuC7A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDZoX0Eq4TcbpP=+YMPmq-F3CAGB1dSogYJa6V2F-irbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANF0JMCA+HQ7=xEXjDkgxLt2iqUj3Wdq_+2+KFsPg34a0m+nxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCqRL5R8v5RivjRkNHQtMFiKs3Rhva+X5NogMB6_qMaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:35:15 +0800
Message-ID: <CAProHASRwM8-Nnd6rPsXtXk85Vb9gNeBshppFjUQxpnLTJsjDg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regarding call Chinese names
From: "Cao,Zhen" <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Big5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:35:17 -0000

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ted,
>>
>> I did explain them in the 1st paragraph about minorities (not mentioned
>> that they could have two kids in mainland)
>> anyway, I will revise the title by adding "Chinese "Han" people", hope
>> that will be ok
>>
>> -Hui
>>
>>
>
> While it is always valuable to note national minorities, I believe you
> missed the point.  In some territories, there are dialects of Chinese other
> than Mandarin and romanizations
> other than pinyin which are common and normatively correct.  For those
> Chinese people, your document does not apply.  As an example, the current
> chief executive of Hong Kong is properly called Leung Chun Ying (梁振英); his
> predecessor  in that role was Tung Chee Hwa (董建華).   Similar situations
> arise in Taiwan and in many territories where Chinese people are themselves
> national minorities.

That's not Pinyin system. I have a question for you, do you think
these spellings are self pronounciable?

>
> Clarifying that your document is specific to the pinyin romanization is
> likely enough (since that romanization is based on Mandarin).

We actually clarify that in pinyin draft,
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zcao-chinese-pronounce-01

Thanks,
caozhen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email