Re: Regarding call Chinese names

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 15 July 2013 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AC921F8D16 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.739
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.474, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UE1pT9NxWc0U for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD3521F87D1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id c10so26952707ieb.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2rq3eBWUWLbPZ0T2OFY/m0lQdO/e4LTuwAiIvcc6ICk=; b=gO/HSDixsM1jg+iJMiV3QFTVuLcVYeN98ccEQyPRc7h8JOrnNA0g0I1NuS0HtmNwSX wlWMa+Uv11JkCvuIjf+Ljm1I7Iq4jnmnWDhdXgwOwjxer6pjrnLIE+hh1/MbZbfXuKii Frrg2dQnaO+axRqJoljNM5mjZi6dcxfaM0fnRdCBOk4TemMNLGpsDDsPW8pbAABZEVPt hkOpy8zhMRPwD7Sx+jbOAEoNzYWQ0j18nbZsB4gMKJBtWXZB5YW4pWexOOZs+t5smqOi 5QO9bO3xUH619k8Nh2VPRHPlvsSPueY7s6SOBvJphWjJdZPQMoQzjy5LKiDDojUrWwt/ vaHw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.134.9 with SMTP id pg9mr7516202igb.29.1373904289961; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.29.202 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANF0JMCA+HQ7=xEXjDkgxLt2iqUj3Wdq_+2+KFsPg34a0m+nxQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANF0JMBtNf9+=+CXo0xydfQ8AtQWaVYVKLBHmq8jBR-s2AuC7A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMDZoX0Eq4TcbpP=+YMPmq-F3CAGB1dSogYJa6V2F-irbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANF0JMCA+HQ7=xEXjDkgxLt2iqUj3Wdq_+2+KFsPg34a0m+nxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:04:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCqRL5R8v5RivjRkNHQtMFiKs3Rhva+X5NogMB6_qMaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regarding call Chinese names
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b41407e289f5f04e18f05f0"
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:04:51 -0000

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ted,
>
> I did explain them in the 1st paragraph about minorities (not mentioned
> that they could have two kids in mainland)
> anyway, I will revise the title by adding "Chinese "Han" people", hope
> that will be ok
>
> -Hui
>
>
>
While it is always valuable to note national minorities, I believe you
missed the point.  In some territories, there are dialects of Chinese other
than Mandarin and romanizations
other than pinyin which are common and normatively correct.  For those
Chinese people, your document does not apply.  As an example, the current
chief executive of Hong Kong is properly called Leung Chun Ying (梁振英); his
predecessor  in that role was Tung Chee Hwa (董建華).   Similar situations
arise in Taiwan and in many territories where Chinese people are themselves
national minorities.

Clarifying that your document is specific to the pinyin romanization is
likely enough (since that romanization is based on Mandarin).

best regards,

Ted Hardie





> 2013/7/11 Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Thanks for your efforts.  I would suggest, however, that you re-title
>> your drafts so that "Chinese" is restricted to the populations which use
>> pinyin and have standardized on what English speakers call Mandarin (國語
>> or 普通話, depending on your background).  Those who use  romanizations
>> based on other dialects, in line with their familial pronunciation, would
>> otherwise be treated as not "Chinese".
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Ted Hardie
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all
>>>
>>> We submitted two drafts to help people here to correctly call chinese
>>> people names:
>>>
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-call-chinese-names-00
>>>
>>>    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zcao-chinese-pronounce-00
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Feel free to let us know if you have any other issues?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Hui Deng
>>>
>>
>>
>