IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Dispute process (Was: Resignation request)

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Wed, 11 March 2020 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7691B3A0D8E; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2lzwoZh21ct2; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 500B53A0D8D; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0313A348743; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:42:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7HHMeczgzL-x; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:42:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [172.16.1.18] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29EE1A34873A; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:42:38 -0500 (CDT)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Alex Bogdanov <bogdanov=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Dispute process (Was: Resignation request)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:42:37 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <079E47CD-716F-4CDD-8E59-C95C79AEF725@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <20200311205718.GE18021@localhost>
References: <20200310184518.GY18021@localhost> <EB49F5CB-1FD1-4FB1-867B-886233E33B38@nohats.ca> <20200310233442.GZ18021@localhost> <0D0D273B-345D-457D-B2B9-9B43C780191A@episteme.net> <20200311205718.GE18021@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; markup="markdown"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/HhUaidXCR-GfqUZ5VlhdUZAz-Ik>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:42:46 -0000

On 11 Mar 2020, at 15:57, Nico Williams wrote:

>> I would refer you to RFC 7776. I don't think this would be in the
>> ombudsteam's purview. (Not trying to get out of work, really!)
>
> I was suggesting updating that, not acting as though we already have :)

Uh...I think we have enough on our plate. :-)

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email