IETF Logo Mail Archive

Fwd: Resignation request

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Mon, 02 March 2020 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8DC3A1149 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:53:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A7Qrc7VopN3v for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:53:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAEE53A1146 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 12:53:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9C9D808C6; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:46:23 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Fwd: Resignation request
References: <E85AEEC7-AAE7-4AE8-966E-FDF7AFD2B47C@steffann.nl>
To: "'ietf@ietf.org'" <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <E85AEEC7-AAE7-4AE8-966E-FDF7AFD2B47C@steffann.nl>
Message-ID: <64ab524f-0dea-76bb-47ec-08e1cfbde121@si6networks.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 17:46:12 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E85AEEC7-AAE7-4AE8-966E-FDF7AFD2B47C@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------43100E0112A1C15784A26E3B"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SmNQVW5ubrwWZxspvbr9NHHhfek>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 20:54:00 -0000

FYI


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Resignation request
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 21:32:53 +0100
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
To: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux 
<martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
CC: ietf@ietf.org

Hi,

I am shocked by the declaration of consensus on 
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming by Martin Vigoureux. There 
was much discussion going on about one aspect of the draft, and there 
was clearly no consensus amongst the participants. There are still 
questions that haven't been answered about even the applicability of the 
contested text, let alone addressed. Promised about for example 
reporting back on the impact on RIR policies have never been fulfilled. 
And those are just the two bits that concern me most personally.

Steamrolling a draft through a working group completely undermines the 
whole idea of the IETF and greatly damages it trustworthiness and 
reliability.  By bluntly declaring consensus despite all of the 
objections within two hours of the latest version of the draft being 
published I feel that Martin Vigoureux has lost the credibility as an 
AD. I strongly feel a resignation is in order at this point.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email